Comparison Overview

Kids Forward

VS

Higher Education Funding Council for England

Kids Forward

122 W Washington Ave, Madison, Wisconsin, 53703, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Kids Forward is a statewide child and family policy advocacy organization that has operated in Wisconsin for 140 years. Kids Forward advocates for effective, long-lasting solutions that break down barriers to success for children and families in Wisconsin, notably children and families of color and those furthest from opportunity. Using research and a community-informed approach, Kids Forward strives for a Wisconsin where every kid, every family, and every community can thrive.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Higher Education Funding Council for England

Nicholson House, BRISTOL, undefined, BS34 8SR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) funds and regulates universities and colleges in England. We invest on behalf of students and the public to promote excellence and innovation in research, teaching and knowledge exchange. In all our activities we will aim to: • ensure accountability for funding and be a proportionate regulator • act in the public interest and be open, fair, impartial and objective • be an effective broker between Government and the sector and in doing so, ensure that we are implementing government policy effectively. Stay up to date with us via Twitter: https://twitter.com/hefce Our jobs site is at http://www.hefce.ac.uk/careers/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wisconsin-council-on-children-&-families.jpeg
Kids Forward
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/higher-education-funding-council-for-england.jpeg
Higher Education Funding Council for England
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kids Forward
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Higher Education Funding Council for England
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kids Forward in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Higher Education Funding Council for England in 2025.

Incident History — Kids Forward (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kids Forward cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Higher Education Funding Council for England (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Higher Education Funding Council for England cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wisconsin-council-on-children-&-families.jpeg
Kids Forward
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/higher-education-funding-council-for-england.jpeg
Higher Education Funding Council for England
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Higher Education Funding Council for England company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kids Forward company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Higher Education Funding Council for England company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kids Forward company.

In the current year, Higher Education Funding Council for England company and Kids Forward company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Higher Education Funding Council for England company nor Kids Forward company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Higher Education Funding Council for England company nor Kids Forward company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Higher Education Funding Council for England company nor Kids Forward company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kids Forward company nor Higher Education Funding Council for England company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kids Forward nor Higher Education Funding Council for England holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kids Forward company nor Higher Education Funding Council for England company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Higher Education Funding Council for England company employs more people globally than Kids Forward company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Kids Forward nor Higher Education Funding Council for England holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kids Forward nor Higher Education Funding Council for England holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kids Forward nor Higher Education Funding Council for England holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kids Forward nor Higher Education Funding Council for England holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kids Forward nor Higher Education Funding Council for England holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kids Forward nor Higher Education Funding Council for England holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H