Comparison Overview

WIRED

VS

Lenskart.com

WIRED

520 Third Street, San Francisco, 94107, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 650 and 699

WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. The WIRED conversation illuminates how technology is changing every aspect of our lives--from culture to business, science to design. The breakthroughs and innovations that we cover lead to new ways of thinking, new connections, and new industries. We introduce you to the people, companies, and ideas that matter.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 526
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Lenskart.com

Sector 43, Golf Course Road, GF, Vipul Tech Square, Gurgaon, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 800 and 849

At Lenskart, we believe that clear vision is fundamental to the personal development and well-being of an individual, and our aim is to build tech-enabled solutions that improve access to affordable and quality ‘Eyewear for All’. We commenced our operations in India as an online business in 2010 and opened our first retail store in New Delhi in 2013. Since then, we have scaled through both the online and offline channels and have established a presence through our retail stores, websites, mobile applications, and other channels.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,951
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wired.jpeg
WIRED
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lenskart-com.jpeg
Lenskart.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WIRED
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lenskart.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WIRED in 2026.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lenskart.com in 2026.

Incident History — WIRED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WIRED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lenskart.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lenskart.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wired.jpeg
WIRED
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Retaliation for ignored security warnings, potential financial gain (data sold on dark web)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Massive data collection
Motivation: Surveillance and data collection
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Cell-site simulator
Motivation: Unauthorized surveillance
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lenskart-com.jpeg
Lenskart.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lenskart.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to WIRED company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

WIRED company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lenskart.com company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lenskart.com company and WIRED company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lenskart.com company nor WIRED company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

WIRED company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lenskart.com company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lenskart.com company nor WIRED company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

WIRED company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Lenskart.com company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither WIRED nor Lenskart.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

WIRED company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lenskart.com company.

Lenskart.com company employs more people globally than WIRED company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither WIRED nor Lenskart.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WIRED nor Lenskart.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WIRED nor Lenskart.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WIRED nor Lenskart.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WIRED nor Lenskart.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WIRED nor Lenskart.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N