Comparison Overview

Winnov

VS

Pars Technology

Winnov

3910 Freedom Circle, Santa Clara, CA, 95054, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Winnov is a technology leader in HD capture and streaming and maker of Cbox – the platform that evolves with customer needs. Cbox solutions provide organizations with a cost-effective way to easily capture and share rich media experiences. Fortune 500 companies, leading universities, training organizations, and government agencies rely on Cbox to create the most engaging live and on-demand video experiences for the web and mobile devices. For more information, visit www.winnov.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pars Technology

Unit 4, Milton Keynes, MK10 0AQ, GB
Last Update:
Between 800 and 849

Pars have enjoyed phenomenal growth across the business, through the provision of high quality, customer-centric IT solutions, and have sustained this growth with a dedicated team of professionals and a company ethos that has customer retention running through its core. Pars Technology Ltd has achieved the very highest technical accolades from the market leaders, including Intel Premier Provider and Microsoft Gold Certificate Partner Status.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winnov.jpeg
Winnov
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pars-technology.jpeg
Pars Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Winnov
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pars Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Winnov in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pars Technology in 2025.

Incident History — Winnov (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Winnov cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pars Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pars Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winnov.jpeg
Winnov
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pars-technology.jpeg
Pars Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pars Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Winnov company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pars Technology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Winnov company.

In the current year, Pars Technology company and Winnov company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pars Technology company nor Winnov company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pars Technology company nor Winnov company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pars Technology company nor Winnov company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Winnov company nor Pars Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Winnov nor Pars Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Winnov company nor Pars Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Winnov company employs more people globally than Pars Technology company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Winnov nor Pars Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Winnov nor Pars Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Winnov nor Pars Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Winnov nor Pars Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Winnov nor Pars Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Winnov nor Pars Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H