Comparison Overview

Winking Fish

VS

Zigma Force

Winking Fish

3100 Clarendon Blvd, Arlington, Virginia, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Winking Fish is a full-service creative studio. We are brand builders, storytellers, artists, problem solvers and partners-in-creativity to our clients. Our team has decades of experience in communications strategy, content development, visual media and graphic design. We work in partnership with our clients to define clear communications strategies for each project, and execute solutions that deliver.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zigma Force

18346 Collins St, Tarzana, CA, 91356, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

You probably know that having a professional website can help you increase sales and expose you to thousands of new clients. The question is "can you afford NOT to have a professional website?"​ We offer informational and E-Commerce sites, with HTML, Dreamweaver, CSS, and PHP. We also promote your site. On the other hand we support your Hardware, LAN, Software, and we train all of them. We hope you will find the services you are looking for. We can handle all your marketing and creative needs from design to marketing.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winking-fish.jpeg
Winking Fish
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zigma-force.jpeg
Zigma Force
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Winking Fish
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zigma Force
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Winking Fish in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zigma Force in 2025.

Incident History — Winking Fish (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Winking Fish cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zigma Force (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zigma Force cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winking-fish.jpeg
Winking Fish
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zigma-force.jpeg
Zigma Force
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Winking Fish company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zigma Force company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zigma Force company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Winking Fish company.

In the current year, Zigma Force company and Winking Fish company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zigma Force company nor Winking Fish company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zigma Force company nor Winking Fish company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zigma Force company nor Winking Fish company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Winking Fish company nor Zigma Force company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Winking Fish nor Zigma Force holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Winking Fish company nor Zigma Force company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Winking Fish company employs more people globally than Zigma Force company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Winking Fish nor Zigma Force holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Winking Fish nor Zigma Force holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Winking Fish nor Zigma Force holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Winking Fish nor Zigma Force holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Winking Fish nor Zigma Force holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Winking Fish nor Zigma Force holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X