Comparison Overview

Wing Haven

VS

Sheffield Museums

Wing Haven

260 Ridgewood Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Located in the heart of Charlotte, North Carolina, Wing Haven provides a natural oasis for reflection and study of its three public gardens. Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary is rich in Southern horticulture and a habitat for birds and wildlife. The Elizabeth Lawrence House & Garden is the site of a world-renowned garden writer’s living laboratory. The new SEED Wildlife & Children’s Gardens provide hands-on exploratory learning and a natural habitat for local wildlife. Together, these properties welcome visitors of all ages to discover and learn. Wing Haven offers more than 40 programs and special events each year. Wing Haven organizes outreach to at-risk preschool children through our PEEPs initiative.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sheffield Museums

Arundel Gate, Sheffield, GB, S1 2PP
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Sheffield Museums Trust is the independent charity that operates six of the city’s leading museums and heritage sites: Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet, Graves Gallery, Kelham Island Museum, Millennium Gallery, Shepherd Wheel and Weston Park Museum. Established in 2021, the charity cares for the city’s collections of art, human and industrial history, and natural science, alongside the Guild of St George’s John Ruskin collection and is home to the Ken Hawley Collection Trust’s Hawley Tool Collection. We work with our communities to tell the remarkable story of Sheffield and its people, and celebrate its reputation for excellence in craft, making and innovation. Together with local, regional and national partners, we showcase home-grown creative talent and bring outstanding cultural experiences to the city.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wing-haven.jpeg
Wing Haven
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffieldmuseums.jpeg
Sheffield Museums
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wing Haven
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sheffield Museums
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wing Haven in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheffield Museums in 2026.

Incident History — Wing Haven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wing Haven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sheffield Museums (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheffield Museums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wing-haven.jpeg
Wing Haven
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffieldmuseums.jpeg
Sheffield Museums
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Wing Haven company and Sheffield Museums company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Sheffield Museums company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wing Haven company.

In the current year, Sheffield Museums company and Wing Haven company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor Wing Haven company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor Wing Haven company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor Wing Haven company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wing Haven company nor Sheffield Museums company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wing Haven nor Sheffield Museums holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wing Haven company nor Sheffield Museums company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sheffield Museums company employs more people globally than Wing Haven company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Wing Haven nor Sheffield Museums holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Sheffield Museums holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Sheffield Museums holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Sheffield Museums holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Sheffield Museums holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Sheffield Museums holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.