Comparison Overview

Wing Haven

VS

Guggenheim New York

Wing Haven

260 Ridgewood Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Located in the heart of Charlotte, North Carolina, Wing Haven provides a natural oasis for reflection and study of its three public gardens. Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary is rich in Southern horticulture and a habitat for birds and wildlife. The Elizabeth Lawrence House & Garden is the site of a world-renowned garden writer’s living laboratory. The new SEED Wildlife & Children’s Gardens provide hands-on exploratory learning and a natural habitat for local wildlife. Together, these properties welcome visitors of all ages to discover and learn. Wing Haven offers more than 40 programs and special events each year. Wing Haven organizes outreach to at-risk preschool children through our PEEPs initiative.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Guggenheim New York

1071 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10128, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1937, the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation is dedicated to promoting the understanding and appreciation of art, architecture, and other manifestations of visual culture, primarily of the modern and contemporary periods. The Guggenheim realizes this mission through exceptional exhibitions, education programs, research initiatives, and publications. The Guggenheim strives to engage and educate an increasingly diverse international audience through its unique network of museums and partnerships. With nearly three million annual visitors worldwide, the Guggenheim and its network is one of the most visited cultural institutions in the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wing-haven.jpeg
Wing Haven
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wing Haven
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Guggenheim New York
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wing Haven in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guggenheim New York in 2026.

Incident History — Wing Haven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wing Haven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Guggenheim New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guggenheim New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wing-haven.jpeg
Wing Haven
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Guggenheim New York company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wing Haven company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Guggenheim New York company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wing Haven company.

In the current year, Guggenheim New York company and Wing Haven company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Wing Haven company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Wing Haven company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Wing Haven company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wing Haven company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wing Haven nor Guggenheim New York holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wing Haven company nor Guggenheim New York company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Guggenheim New York company employs more people globally than Wing Haven company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Wing Haven nor Guggenheim New York holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Guggenheim New York holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Guggenheim New York holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Guggenheim New York holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Guggenheim New York holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wing Haven nor Guggenheim New York holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.