Comparison Overview

Windward Communications Group

VS

Popular Ink

Windward Communications Group

undefined, undefined, undefined, 98103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Windward Communications Group is a quality sheet fed multi color offset printer providing full service printing and graphics. We strive to be a strategically oriented business, aware of and embracing changing technology, markets and other pertinent external developments. We have a strong commitment to place the needs of the customer at the fore front of every job. We are involved in job engineering and proactive in offering options to maintain budget constraints. We anticipate technical problems and discuss solutions to ensure customer expectations can be met. We stand behind the products we produce. The greatest value we have to offer is our ability to respond to the complete needs of our customers. Windward Communications Group is certified for Forest Stewardship Council Chain-Of-Custody. The Forest Stewardship Council, or FSC, promotes the responsible management of the world's forests. Our knowledgeable and experienced staff assures the customer that he or she will receive immediate and continuous attention throughout the various steps of their project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Popular Ink

2040 Redbud Blvd., Mckinney, Texas, 75070, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Popular Ink is a printer of flexible packaging materials, founded by Ray Salinas and Dru Riess. At Popular Ink, we are here to print popular products, build a brand, create a unique culture, and be consistent at our craft. We promise every impression we print will be treated as our first impression. We are invested in protecting our customer’s brand, by recognizing their success is directly proportional to our own.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/windward-communications-group.jpeg
Windward Communications Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Windward Communications Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Popular Ink
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Windward Communications Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Popular Ink in 2025.

Incident History — Windward Communications Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Windward Communications Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Popular Ink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Popular Ink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/windward-communications-group.jpeg
Windward Communications Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/popular-ink.jpeg
Popular Ink
Incidents

FAQ

Windward Communications Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Popular Ink company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Popular Ink company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Windward Communications Group company.

In the current year, Popular Ink company and Windward Communications Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Popular Ink company nor Windward Communications Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Popular Ink company nor Windward Communications Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Popular Ink company nor Windward Communications Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Windward Communications Group company nor Popular Ink company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Windward Communications Group nor Popular Ink holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Windward Communications Group company nor Popular Ink company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Windward Communications Group company employs more people globally than Popular Ink company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Windward Communications Group nor Popular Ink holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Windward Communications Group nor Popular Ink holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Windward Communications Group nor Popular Ink holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Windward Communications Group nor Popular Ink holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Windward Communications Group nor Popular Ink holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Windward Communications Group nor Popular Ink holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N