Comparison Overview

Winamac Coil Spring Inc.

VS

GEM Manufacturing, Inc

Winamac Coil Spring Inc.

512 N. Smith St., Kewanna, IN, 46339, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

WCS is a premier coil spring and wire form manufacturer. Founded in 1948 by Walter Pesaresi, the family owned and operated business is now considered a global industry leader supplying compression, extension, torsion and double torsion springs to equipment and machine manufacturers around the world. Lead by the highly qualified and experienced engineering department, WCS can create and design components for our clients, or we can work with existing design specifications to incorporate the design into our production stream. Our production capabilities span the gamut in coil over spring and wire form manufacturing. Wire size specifications range from .008"​ to .625"​ on most applications and tines up to .750"​. For more information go to: www.winamaccoilspring.com or call 574-653-2186.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GEM Manufacturing, Inc

6919 51st Street, Kenosha, WI, 53144, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

GEM Manufacturing, Inc. is a leading manufacturer of precision machined components for a wide array of industrial applications. Some of these products include hydraulic valve bodies, covers, manifolds, shafts, spindles, flanges, spools, housings, pistons and receivers. GEM’s customers span every industry including hydraulics, oil and gas, defense, agriculture, food processing, construction, fluid handling and pump processing. • GEM specializes in high mix - low to mid volume CNC Turned and Milled products • We manufacture over 2,000 different part numbers annually in volumes from 5 to 50,000 • GEM is ISO 9001:2008 Registered • Single Source responsibility • Lean, Six Sigma, latest technologies and the management team has over 100 years of combined machining industry experience. • GEM has been certified by some of the world’s largest OEMs, a distinction that sets us apart. We have sustained these certifications for many years - even as their requirements have become progressively more robust. The bottom line - Better engineering. Better quality. Better value.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winamac-coil-spring.jpeg
Winamac Coil Spring Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gem-manufacturing-inc.jpeg
GEM Manufacturing, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Winamac Coil Spring Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GEM Manufacturing, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Winamac Coil Spring Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEM Manufacturing, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Winamac Coil Spring Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Winamac Coil Spring Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GEM Manufacturing, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEM Manufacturing, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winamac-coil-spring.jpeg
Winamac Coil Spring Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gem-manufacturing-inc.jpeg
GEM Manufacturing, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GEM Manufacturing, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GEM Manufacturing, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company.

In the current year, GEM Manufacturing, Inc company and Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GEM Manufacturing, Inc company nor Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GEM Manufacturing, Inc company nor Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GEM Manufacturing, Inc company nor Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company nor GEM Manufacturing, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Winamac Coil Spring Inc. nor GEM Manufacturing, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GEM Manufacturing, Inc company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company.

Winamac Coil Spring Inc. company employs more people globally than GEM Manufacturing, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Winamac Coil Spring Inc. nor GEM Manufacturing, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Winamac Coil Spring Inc. nor GEM Manufacturing, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Winamac Coil Spring Inc. nor GEM Manufacturing, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Winamac Coil Spring Inc. nor GEM Manufacturing, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Winamac Coil Spring Inc. nor GEM Manufacturing, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Winamac Coil Spring Inc. nor GEM Manufacturing, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H