Comparison Overview

McClatchy Advertising

VS

TBWA\Worldwide

McClatchy Advertising

Last Update: 2024-08-11 (UTC)

Excellent

We offer our clients access to a loyal audience that for decades has trusted our journalism to help our community be the best it can be. Backed by the power of McClatchy, we customize a robust, innovative and scalable portfolio of modern media solutions to help our clients grow in measurable ways. Our consultative approach brings data-driven professionals and best-in-class marketing resources together to deliver the right message to the right audience at the right time.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

TBWA\Worldwide

220 E 42nd St, New York, NY, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-03-02 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

TBWA is The Disruption Companyยฎ. We are a Collective of creative minds with an unlimited creative canvas. We create brand platforms that defy convention and compete with culture. Thanks to our trademarked Disruptionยฎ methodology, we build the worldโ€™s strongest brands. Brands that own an unfair share of the future. Named one of the World's Most Innovative Companies by Fast Company in 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019, TBWA is also Adweek's 2024, 2022, 2021 and 2018 Global Agency of the Year and AdAgeโ€™s A-List 2022 Network of the Year. Our Collective has 11,000+ creative minds in over 40 countries, and also includes brands such as Auditoire, Digital Arts Network (DAN), eg+ worldwide, GMR, TBWA\Media Arts Lab, TBWA\Health Collective and TRO. Global clients include adidas, Apple, Gatorade, Henkel, Hilton Hotels, McDonald's, Nissan and Singapore Airlines. TBWA is part of Omnicom Group (NYSE: OMC).

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 11,737
Subsidiaries: 72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/win-with-mcclatchy.jpeg
McClatchy Advertising
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tbwa.jpeg
TBWA\Worldwide
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
McClatchy Advertising
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TBWA\Worldwide
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McClatchy Advertising in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TBWA\Worldwide in 2025.

Incident History โ€” McClatchy Advertising (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McClatchy Advertising cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” TBWA\Worldwide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TBWA\Worldwide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/win-with-mcclatchy.jpeg
McClatchy Advertising
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2018
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tbwa.jpeg
TBWA\Worldwide
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Bluetooth Protocol
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both McClatchy Advertising company and TBWA\Worldwide company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

McClatchy Advertising and TBWA\Worldwide have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, TBWA\Worldwide company has reported more cyber incidents than McClatchy Advertising company.

McClatchy Advertising company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while TBWA\Worldwide company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TBWA\Worldwide company nor McClatchy Advertising company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TBWA\Worldwide company nor McClatchy Advertising company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

TBWA\Worldwide company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while McClatchy Advertising company has not reported such incidents publicly.

TBWA\Worldwide company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to McClatchy Advertising company.

TBWA\Worldwide company employs more people globally than McClatchy Advertising company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. The affected element is the function elf_swap_shdr in the library bfd/elfcode.h of the component Linker. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack must be carried out locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 9ca499644a21ceb3f946d1c179c38a83be084490. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Impacted is the function _bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component Linker. Executing manipulation can lead to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been published and may be used. This patch is called ea1a0737c7692737a644af0486b71e4a392cbca8. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in GNU Binutils 2.45. This issue affects the function dump_dwarf_section of the file binutils/objdump.c. Performing manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. The attack is only possible with local access. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named f87a66db645caf8cc0e6fc87b0c28c78a38af59b. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.7
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in zhuimengshaonian wisdom-education up to 1.0.4. This vulnerability affects the function selectStudentExamInfoList of the file src/main/java/com/education/api/controller/student/ExamInfoController.java. Such manipulation of the argument subjectId leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Farm Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation results in file and directory information exposure. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X