Comparison Overview

Wilson Industrial Electric

VS

Danieli Systec

Wilson Industrial Electric

1124 Willie Black Rd, Elberton, Georgia 30635, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Wilson Industrial Electric is an original stone processing equipment manufacturer specializing in custom built machines. Wilson also has a UL 508A certified Panel Lab where we build control systems for other businesses as well as our own. Wilson has a fully equipped CNC Machine Shop, Fabrication Shop, Sheet Metal Shop, and Engineering Lab that utilizes SolidWorks for all of our machinery and electrical designs. Wilson has a retail store for replacement parts sales for equipment as well as Ag and Lawn Maintenance parts replacement.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Danieli Systec

Vinež 601, Labin, 52220, HR
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The company was founded in 1991 and has about 300 employees today, most of whom are university educated. Danieli Systec has offices in Labin, Rijeka, Osijek, Zagreb and Solin and two sister companies in Slovenia and Serbia. We are engaged in engineering and commissioning of industrial plants. In the long-term partnership with Danieli Automation S.p.A which is part of Danieli Group, we have participated in more than 300 projects. We can proudly say that we are one of the largest companies in the field of industrial automation and process control in Croatia. Our mission is to find an optimal and cost-effective solution using knowledge gained all over the world. Our advantage is the knowledge and experience of our employees. In the metal industry there are not many companies that are characterized by experience and variety like us. If you are an ambitious person, focused on solutions and customer satisfaction and ready to work with the latest technologies, contact us and get the opportunity to work on interesting and dynamic international projects and innovations!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 233
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wilson-industrial-electric.jpeg
Wilson Industrial Electric
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danieli-systec.jpeg
Danieli Systec
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wilson Industrial Electric
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Danieli Systec
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wilson Industrial Electric in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danieli Systec in 2025.

Incident History — Wilson Industrial Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wilson Industrial Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Danieli Systec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danieli Systec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wilson-industrial-electric.jpeg
Wilson Industrial Electric
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danieli-systec.jpeg
Danieli Systec
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Danieli Systec company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wilson Industrial Electric company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Danieli Systec company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wilson Industrial Electric company.

In the current year, Danieli Systec company and Wilson Industrial Electric company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Danieli Systec company nor Wilson Industrial Electric company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Danieli Systec company nor Wilson Industrial Electric company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Danieli Systec company nor Wilson Industrial Electric company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wilson Industrial Electric company nor Danieli Systec company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wilson Industrial Electric nor Danieli Systec holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Danieli Systec company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Wilson Industrial Electric company.

Danieli Systec company employs more people globally than Wilson Industrial Electric company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Wilson Industrial Electric nor Danieli Systec holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wilson Industrial Electric nor Danieli Systec holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wilson Industrial Electric nor Danieli Systec holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wilson Industrial Electric nor Danieli Systec holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wilson Industrial Electric nor Danieli Systec holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wilson Industrial Electric nor Danieli Systec holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H