Comparison Overview

Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys

VS

Apolat Legal

Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys

5th Floor, Blackfriars House, The Parsonage, Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M3 2JA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Wilson Gunn is a leading UK firm of patent and trade mark attorneys, with offices in Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Chesterfield, London and Glasgow. We specialise in protecting, maintaining and enforcing intellectual property rights in the UK, Europe and around the world. Our attorneys provide strategic advice across all aspects of IP, including patents, trade marks, designs and copyright. We provide an efficient and cost-effective service to clients in the UK and overseas, including multinational corporations, SMEs and research institutions. As IP experts, we also advise and assist other professionals, including solicitors, accountants and consultants. Our technical expertise and commercial approach are combined with a user-friendly, approachable style. We pride ourselves on delivering outstanding client service.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Apolat Legal

4th Floor, XL building, 167 Tran Nao Street, An Khanh Ward, Thu Duc City, 700000, VN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Apolat Legal is a local law firm with head offices in Ho Chi Minh city. Our experience, our depth of local, and English-qualified lawyers help our clients work with confidence in any legal issues. By thinking on behalf of our clients every day, we anticipate what they want, provide what they need and help our clients achieve their ambitions. Commercial l Investment l Intellectual Property l Dispute Resolution l Corporate.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wilson-gunn-patent-&-trade-mark-attorneys.jpeg
Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Apolat Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apolat Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Apolat Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apolat Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wilson-gunn-patent-&-trade-mark-attorneys.jpeg
Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apolatlegal.jpeg
Apolat Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Apolat Legal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Apolat Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company.

In the current year, Apolat Legal company and Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Apolat Legal company nor Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Apolat Legal company nor Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Apolat Legal company nor Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company nor Apolat Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys nor Apolat Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company nor Apolat Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys company employs more people globally than Apolat Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys nor Apolat Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys nor Apolat Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys nor Apolat Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys nor Apolat Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys nor Apolat Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wilson Gunn | Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys nor Apolat Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X