Comparison Overview

Wilson Browne Solicitors

VS

Ginsberg Partners, Inc.

Wilson Browne Solicitors

Kettering Venture Park, Kettering, NN15 6WN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

When you need legal advice, you deserve a firm that will stand with you every step of the way: that’s where we come in. At Wilson Browne Solicitors, we understand that facing legal issues can be daunting, so we’re here to make the process as smooth and stress-free as possible. With our friendly, down-to-earth approach, there’s no need to feel apprehensive about contacting us. We’re dedicated to providing you with the support and guidance you need, no matter how complex the situation. Give us a call today at 0800 088 6004, and we’ll discuss your concerns to see if it’s something we can assist you with. And here’s the best part – that initial assessment* is completely free and without obligation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 168
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ginsberg Partners, Inc.

140 East 45th Street, 39th Floor, New York, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Ginsberg Partners Inc. employs a distinct approach to executive legal search. We are an integrated team of professionals dedicated to the highest levels of integrity, quality and service to our clients and candidates. Together we offer extensive experience in the legal and search industries with particular expertise in partner, group and other senior placements in the top law firms in the world. We understand and meet both client and candidate needs across the country and internationally. Most importantly, we work as hard as our clients do to get the job done right.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wilson-browne-solicitors.jpeg
Wilson Browne Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ginsberg Partners, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wilson Browne Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ginsberg Partners, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wilson Browne Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ginsberg Partners, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Wilson Browne Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wilson Browne Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ginsberg Partners, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ginsberg Partners, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wilson-browne-solicitors.jpeg
Wilson Browne Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ginsberg Partners, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wilson Browne Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wilson Browne Solicitors company.

In the current year, Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company and Wilson Browne Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company nor Wilson Browne Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company nor Wilson Browne Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company nor Wilson Browne Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors company nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors company nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wilson Browne Solicitors company employs more people globally than Ginsberg Partners, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wilson Browne Solicitors nor Ginsberg Partners, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X