Comparison Overview

Willow Wellness Center

VS

St. Mary's Home for Children

Willow Wellness Center

2604 Dempster St, Park Ridge, 60068, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.willowwellness.com

We are a multi-disciplinary psychology center located in Park Ridge, Illinois, a near-northwest suburb of Chicago. We provide psychological care and counseling to address depression, anxiety, and life transition issues, as well as a variety of other concerns - pain management, grief and loss, marital and family issues, dementia, panic attacks, and many other concerns.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

St. Mary's Home for Children

420 Fruit Hill Ave, North Providence, 02911, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.smhfc.org/

Since 1877, our mission has been to create an environment of healing and hope for those we serve. Children and families are empowered to develop healthy, trusting relationships. Through an array of residential and community based services, we create effective, lasting partnerships that enable children and adults to lead fulfilling lives. Our programs focus on providing children with the skills and strengths they need to cope with family, school and social environments. We provide families with appropriate supports as they strive to create healthy relationships. Find more information here: https://linktr.ee/smhfc

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/willow-wellness-center.jpeg
Willow Wellness Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-mary-s-home-for-children.jpeg
St. Mary's Home for Children
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Willow Wellness Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
St. Mary's Home for Children
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Willow Wellness Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Mary's Home for Children in 2026.

Incident History — Willow Wellness Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Willow Wellness Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — St. Mary's Home for Children (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Mary's Home for Children cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/willow-wellness-center.jpeg
Willow Wellness Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-mary-s-home-for-children.jpeg
St. Mary's Home for Children
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Willow Wellness Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Mary's Home for Children company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, St. Mary's Home for Children company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Willow Wellness Center company.

In the current year, St. Mary's Home for Children company and Willow Wellness Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither St. Mary's Home for Children company nor Willow Wellness Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither St. Mary's Home for Children company nor Willow Wellness Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither St. Mary's Home for Children company nor Willow Wellness Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Willow Wellness Center company nor St. Mary's Home for Children company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor St. Mary's Home for Children holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Willow Wellness Center company nor St. Mary's Home for Children company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

St. Mary's Home for Children company employs more people globally than Willow Wellness Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor St. Mary's Home for Children holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor St. Mary's Home for Children holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor St. Mary's Home for Children holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor St. Mary's Home for Children holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor St. Mary's Home for Children holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor St. Mary's Home for Children holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References