Comparison Overview

Willow Wellness Center

VS

Bay Area Clinical Associates

Willow Wellness Center

2604 Dempster St, Park Ridge, 60068, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

We are a multi-disciplinary psychology center located in Park Ridge, Illinois, a near-northwest suburb of Chicago. We provide psychological care and counseling to address depression, anxiety, and life transition issues, as well as a variety of other concerns - pain management, grief and loss, marital and family issues, dementia, panic attacks, and many other concerns.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bay Area Clinical Associates

1530 Meridian Ave, 200, San Jose, California, US, 95125
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Bay Area Clinical Associates! Since 2007, our team of clinicians has been providing innovative mental health services to young individuals and families across the San Francisco Bay Area. We are dedicated to treating mental illness in our patients and guiding them toward cultivating positive habits and unlocking their maximum potential. What sets us apart is our unwavering dedication to administering evidence-based treatment to young individuals dealing with mental health challenges. Our collaborative approach involves a diverse treatment team comprising proficient psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, licensed marriage & family therapists, as well as pre-licensed clinicians, all working cohesively within an integrated care framework. BACA's commitment extends to fostering an exceptional work environment for clinicians, aiming to be the top choice for Bay Area professionals in the field.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/willow-wellness-center.jpeg
Willow Wellness Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-area-clinical-associates-p-c.jpeg
Bay Area Clinical Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Willow Wellness Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bay Area Clinical Associates
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Willow Wellness Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bay Area Clinical Associates in 2026.

Incident History — Willow Wellness Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Willow Wellness Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bay Area Clinical Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bay Area Clinical Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/willow-wellness-center.jpeg
Willow Wellness Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-area-clinical-associates-p-c.jpeg
Bay Area Clinical Associates
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Willow Wellness Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bay Area Clinical Associates company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bay Area Clinical Associates company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Willow Wellness Center company.

In the current year, Bay Area Clinical Associates company and Willow Wellness Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates company nor Willow Wellness Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates company nor Willow Wellness Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bay Area Clinical Associates company nor Willow Wellness Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Willow Wellness Center company nor Bay Area Clinical Associates company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor Bay Area Clinical Associates holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Willow Wellness Center company nor Bay Area Clinical Associates company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bay Area Clinical Associates company employs more people globally than Willow Wellness Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor Bay Area Clinical Associates holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor Bay Area Clinical Associates holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor Bay Area Clinical Associates holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor Bay Area Clinical Associates holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor Bay Area Clinical Associates holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Willow Wellness Center nor Bay Area Clinical Associates holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H