Comparison Overview

Williamson Adams

VS

Insidesign

Williamson Adams

936 Detroit Avenue, Concord, CA 94518, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

We get it, hiring a creative partner is difficult. So to you, the CMO, the entrepreneur with the big idea, or the unfortunate one who has been handed the task from the powers that be, we feel for you. You’ve spent hours on LinkedIn, you’ve been through all the creative annuals, you’ve visited all corners of the internet, and you’re tired. Let us quickly offer you our perspective. When it comes down to it, you’ll decide to work with us because you like the things we’ve done, you like the honesty of voice, the simplicity of communication, the sophistication and beauty of execution. And when you sit down with us, you’ll see that we get it. So if it feels right, let’s get to work. It’ll be fun.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Insidesign

IT
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Insidesign è un’agenzia creativa che realizza progetti di comunicazione integrata e multicanale. Sulla base delle esigenze di sviluppo dei progetti collaborano con Insidesign vari professionisti della comunicazione visiva (illustratori, art-director, creativi, fotografi, graphic-designer), della web technology (programmatori, sistemisti, esperti di linguaggi web) e delle public relation (giornalisti, redattori, sociologi, comunicatori).

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williamson-adams.jpeg
Williamson Adams
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insidesign.jpeg
Insidesign
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Williamson Adams
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Insidesign
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Williamson Adams in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Insidesign in 2025.

Incident History — Williamson Adams (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Williamson Adams cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Insidesign (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Insidesign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williamson-adams.jpeg
Williamson Adams
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insidesign.jpeg
Insidesign
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Insidesign company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Williamson Adams company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Insidesign company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Williamson Adams company.

In the current year, Insidesign company and Williamson Adams company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Insidesign company nor Williamson Adams company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Insidesign company nor Williamson Adams company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Insidesign company nor Williamson Adams company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Williamson Adams company nor Insidesign company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Williamson Adams nor Insidesign holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Williamson Adams company nor Insidesign company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Insidesign company employs more people globally than Williamson Adams company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Williamson Adams nor Insidesign holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Williamson Adams nor Insidesign holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Williamson Adams nor Insidesign holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Williamson Adams nor Insidesign holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Williamson Adams nor Insidesign holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Williamson Adams nor Insidesign holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X