Comparison Overview

Williams Elleby Howard & Easter

VS

Braithwaite Boyle

Williams Elleby Howard & Easter

3450 Acworth Due West Rd NW, Kennesaw, Georgia, 30144, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The personal injury trial attorneys at Williams Elleby Howard & Easter are based out of Cobb County, Georgia. They litigate serious cases involving car accidents, tractor-trailer wrecks and premises liability injuries throughout the state of Georgia. Joel Williams created this firm to help individuals facing serious personal injuries or death due to the fault of someone else and he only takes cases where he believes that the injured person is entitled to compensation. The firm has successfully tried cases in big cities like Atlanta and Savannah. We are also experienced litigators for small towns throughout the State of Georgia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Braithwaite Boyle

11816 124 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T5L 0M3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Braithwaite Boyle has helped over 20,000 injury victims and is Alberta's only law firm with offices in Edmonton, Calgary and Red Deer. We've been serving Albertans and western Canadians for almost 30 years. We understand the emotional and financial stress that occurs when faced with a personal injury. To help alleviate any additional stress, we offer our experience and extensive qualifications on a contingency fee basis. Clients will not pay any legal fees until your case is settled. We also pay for the engineering investigation, medical and dental experts, occupational therapists, psychiatrists, vocational consultants, income analysts, cost of care assessors, and economists to further your case. These costs can exceed hundreds of thousands of dollars in very serious cases and we collect these costs from the at fault insurance company when the case is resolved. We want to ensure that everyone who has a valid case has access to our very experienced lawyers, medical experts, and other accident/injury experts — regardless of their financial circumstances.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williamselleby.jpeg
Williams Elleby Howard & Easter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/braithwaite-boyle.jpeg
Braithwaite Boyle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Williams Elleby Howard & Easter
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Braithwaite Boyle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Williams Elleby Howard & Easter in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Braithwaite Boyle in 2025.

Incident History — Williams Elleby Howard & Easter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Williams Elleby Howard & Easter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Braithwaite Boyle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Braithwaite Boyle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williamselleby.jpeg
Williams Elleby Howard & Easter
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/braithwaite-boyle.jpeg
Braithwaite Boyle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Braithwaite Boyle company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Braithwaite Boyle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company.

In the current year, Braithwaite Boyle company and Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Braithwaite Boyle company nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Braithwaite Boyle company nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Braithwaite Boyle company nor Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company nor Braithwaite Boyle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter nor Braithwaite Boyle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company nor Braithwaite Boyle company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Braithwaite Boyle company employs more people globally than Williams Elleby Howard & Easter company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter nor Braithwaite Boyle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter nor Braithwaite Boyle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter nor Braithwaite Boyle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter nor Braithwaite Boyle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter nor Braithwaite Boyle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Williams Elleby Howard & Easter nor Braithwaite Boyle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X