Comparison Overview

Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction

VS

ALEC Holdings

Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction

370 Companion Way, Belgrade, MT, 59714, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

For over forty years and counting, Williams has provided the Northwest with first-class plumbing, civil construction, HVAC, engineering, fabrication, and service. Our team is over 350-strong, bringing together the region’s best plumbers, technicians, engineers, and project leaders. Since day one, we’ve put our people first: we aim to provide the best pay, best benefits, and best workplace in the industry. Our values of teamwork, individual responsibility, and commitment to success form the foundation of our culture. Located in beautiful Bozeman, Montana, outdoor adventures surround us. There’s no better place to live than Big Sky Country. Together, we build and play in Montana. Our Vision: To be our industry’s employer of choice. Our Mission: To transform the construction industry for the better. Our Core Values: Teamwork, Individual Responsibility, Commitment to Success Visit our website to learn more! www.willplumb.com

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ALEC Holdings

Marina Walk, Dubai, PO Box 27639, AE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ALEC Holdings, part of the Investment Corporate of Dubai (ICD), is a leading construction and related businesses group operating in the UAE and KSA. The company builds and provides construction solutions that set industry benchmarks for quality, safety, functionality, and aesthetics. ALEC Holdings offers its clients complete turnkey solutions in construction, MEP, fit-out, marine, oil & gas, modular construction, energy efficiency and solar projects, heavy equipment rental, technology systems, data centers and asset maintenance. With these capabilities, the company successfully serves a diverse range of sectors including airports, retail, hotels & resorts, high-rise buildings, and themed projects.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 10,308
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williams-companies.jpeg
Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ALEC Holdings
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALEC Holdings in 2025.

Incident History — Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ALEC Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALEC Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williams-companies.jpeg
Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ALEC Holdings company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ALEC Holdings company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company.

In the current year, ALEC Holdings company and Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction nor ALEC Holdings holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ALEC Holdings company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company.

ALEC Holdings company employs more people globally than Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction nor ALEC Holdings holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction nor ALEC Holdings holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction nor ALEC Holdings holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction nor ALEC Holdings holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction nor ALEC Holdings holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Williams Plumbing / Williams Civil Construction nor ALEC Holdings holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H