Comparison Overview

Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP

VS

Charlotte Smith Reporting

Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP

600 N. Emerson Avenue, Greenwood, IN, 46142, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

WILLIAMS BARRETT & WILKOWSKI, LLP, has a history of excellence in the Greenwood community, as well as throughout central Indiana. We offer a wide range of legal services to a variety of personal and business clientele. We offer legal representation that is thoughtful, professional, efficient and, above all, effective. Our goal is to provide the highest quality legal services to each cleint.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Charlotte Smith Reporting

2203 Timberloch Place, The Woodlands, 77380, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Charlotte Smith Reporting, Inc. is a Texas certified court reporting firm based in Houston, Beaumont and New Orleans. We provide accurate court reporting, online medical records retrieval and large document scanning services. In a field where everyone seems to look and sound the same, what makes us stand out is our ability to keep the process for hiring qualified reporters and ordering records simple while never losing our personal touch. Charlotte has been serving attorneys for over 45 years, and we take pride in the fact that everything we do is geared toward making your life simple.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williams-barrett-&-wilkowski-llp.jpeg
Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-smith-reporting.jpeg
Charlotte Smith Reporting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charlotte Smith Reporting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte Smith Reporting in 2025.

Incident History — Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charlotte Smith Reporting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte Smith Reporting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williams-barrett-&-wilkowski-llp.jpeg
Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-smith-reporting.jpeg
Charlotte Smith Reporting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charlotte Smith Reporting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charlotte Smith Reporting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company.

In the current year, Charlotte Smith Reporting company and Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charlotte Smith Reporting company nor Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charlotte Smith Reporting company nor Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charlotte Smith Reporting company nor Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company nor Charlotte Smith Reporting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP nor Charlotte Smith Reporting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company nor Charlotte Smith Reporting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP company employs more people globally than Charlotte Smith Reporting company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP nor Charlotte Smith Reporting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP nor Charlotte Smith Reporting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP nor Charlotte Smith Reporting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP nor Charlotte Smith Reporting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP nor Charlotte Smith Reporting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP nor Charlotte Smith Reporting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X