Comparison Overview

William Goodyear co.

VS

Prime Products, Inc.

William Goodyear co.

2802 Gray Fox Rd, Monroe, NC, 28110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

We manufacture a variety of rubber products for industrial applications. Our molded products department produces items ranging from poultry picking fingers to truck axle stops. Our roll department can produce rolls up to 12" diameter and 10' long, covered with any vulcanized polymer and finished with any surface profile. Our belting department produces vulcanized belts using our trademarked Posi-Feed compound or any other vulcanized polymer. Belts can be perforated or finished to any customer specification.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prime Products, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Prime Products, Inc. is a Nadcap Certified and an AS9100 Certified contract manufacturer of machined, painted and illuminated components for the aerospace industry and other applications. The company provides contract manufacturing services to more than 30 aerospace customers, including Honeywell, Rockwell Collins, Bowmar, L-3 Communications, GE Aviation Systems and Ultra Electronics Flightline Systems, and more than 30 non-aerospace customers, including Shure, Performance Plastics, X-Rite, Minnesota Rubber & Plastics and Whitehall Industries. Prime Products’ customers depend on our unique manufacturing expertise and our uncompromising commitment to quality and customer service. We take pride in our extensive use of our customer’s online tools for managing order schedules, quotes, quality issues, etc., and in our ability to customize our own business system meet our customer’s needs. Our diverse manufacturing capabilities, which include spray painting, screen and pad printing, laser etching and marking, CO2 laser cutting and CNC milling and turning, allow us to offer short lead times at competitive prices.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-goodyear-co..jpeg
William Goodyear co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prime-products-inc-.jpeg
Prime Products, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
William Goodyear co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prime Products, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for William Goodyear co. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prime Products, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — William Goodyear co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

William Goodyear co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prime Products, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prime Products, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-goodyear-co..jpeg
William Goodyear co.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prime-products-inc-.jpeg
Prime Products, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Prime Products, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to William Goodyear co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prime Products, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to William Goodyear co. company.

In the current year, Prime Products, Inc. company and William Goodyear co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prime Products, Inc. company nor William Goodyear co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prime Products, Inc. company nor William Goodyear co. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prime Products, Inc. company nor William Goodyear co. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither William Goodyear co. company nor Prime Products, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Prime Products, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither William Goodyear co. company nor Prime Products, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Prime Products, Inc. company employs more people globally than William Goodyear co. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Prime Products, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Prime Products, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Prime Products, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Prime Products, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Prime Products, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Prime Products, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H