Comparison Overview

William Goodyear co.

VS

Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd

William Goodyear co.

2802 Gray Fox Rd, Monroe, NC, 28110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

We manufacture a variety of rubber products for industrial applications. Our molded products department produces items ranging from poultry picking fingers to truck axle stops. Our roll department can produce rolls up to 12" diameter and 10' long, covered with any vulcanized polymer and finished with any surface profile. Our belting department produces vulcanized belts using our trademarked Posi-Feed compound or any other vulcanized polymer. Belts can be perforated or finished to any customer specification.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd

50A Rosemount Park Drive, Ballycoolin, D11 TK4C, IE
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd is one of the leading system integrators in the area of industrial automation in Ireland. We offer a full spectrum of related services including system development, upgrades, technical support, project management and validation consultancy. We have built our business on a team of employees that have the required experience and expertise to provide solutions and services that are innovative, reliable and value for money. We are very proud of the long standing relationships we have with many of our clients, many of whom are blue-chip, multinationals. We offer this as an endorsement of our work and ability to deliver to our client’s needs and expectations.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-goodyear-co..jpeg
William Goodyear co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/control-and-information-management-cim-ltd.jpeg
Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
William Goodyear co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for William Goodyear co. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — William Goodyear co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

William Goodyear co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-goodyear-co..jpeg
William Goodyear co.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/control-and-information-management-cim-ltd.jpeg
Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

William Goodyear co. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to William Goodyear co. company.

In the current year, Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company and William Goodyear co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company nor William Goodyear co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company nor William Goodyear co. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company nor William Goodyear co. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither William Goodyear co. company nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither William Goodyear co. company nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd company employs more people globally than William Goodyear co. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither William Goodyear co. nor Control and Information Management (CIM) Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H