Comparison Overview

National Willa Cather Center

VS

Sharlot Hall Museum

National Willa Cather Center

413 North Webster Street, Red Cloud, NE, 68970, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.WillaCather.org

The Willa Cather Foundation is 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization dedicated to advancing the legacy of renowned American author, Willa Cather, through education, historic preservation, and the arts. The Foundation offers tours of historic sites related to Cather's life and work; holds a Spring Conference annually in Red Cloud; and hosts arts performances, humanities presentations, and gallery exhibits in its restored 1885 Red Cloud Opera House. Symposiums, international seminars, and workshops related to Cather's works are regularly held in Nebraska and throughout the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sharlot Hall Museum

415 W. Gurley Street, Prescott, Arizona, 86301, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sharlothallmuseum.org

The Sharlot Hall Museum, founded in 1928 by visionary Sharlot M. Hall, is an open-air museum in downtown Prescott, Arizona. The four-acre campus includes several historic buildings, including the 1864 Territorial Governor's Mansion, as well as expansive exhibits and gardens. Regular events and programs include the annual Prescott Indian Art Market, premier winetasting event Sharlot's WineFest, monthly Living History Adventures, a popular lecture series, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/willa-cather-foundation.jpeg
National Willa Cather Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharlot-hall-museum.jpeg
Sharlot Hall Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Willa Cather Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sharlot Hall Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Willa Cather Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sharlot Hall Museum in 2026.

Incident History — National Willa Cather Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Willa Cather Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sharlot Hall Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sharlot Hall Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/willa-cather-foundation.jpeg
National Willa Cather Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharlot-hall-museum.jpeg
Sharlot Hall Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sharlot Hall Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Willa Cather Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sharlot Hall Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Willa Cather Center company.

In the current year, Sharlot Hall Museum company and National Willa Cather Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor National Willa Cather Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor National Willa Cather Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor National Willa Cather Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Willa Cather Center company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Willa Cather Center company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sharlot Hall Museum company employs more people globally than National Willa Cather Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References