Comparison Overview

National Willa Cather Center

VS

Rolling Hills Zoo

National Willa Cather Center

413 North Webster Street, Red Cloud, NE, 68970, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Willa Cather Foundation is 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization dedicated to advancing the legacy of renowned American author, Willa Cather, through education, historic preservation, and the arts. The Foundation offers tours of historic sites related to Cather's life and work; holds a Spring Conference annually in Red Cloud; and hosts arts performances, humanities presentations, and gallery exhibits in its restored 1885 Red Cloud Opera House. Symposiums, international seminars, and workshops related to Cather's works are regularly held in Nebraska and throughout the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rolling Hills Zoo

625 N. Hedville Road, Hedville (Near Salina), Kansas, 67401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

The Rolling Hills Zoo is a nationally recognized zoological park situated near Salina, Kansas. Our zoo is accredited with the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, The AZA is the independent accrediting organization for the best zoos and aquariums in America and the world, assuring the public that when they visit an AZA-accredited facility, it meets the highest standards. Less than 10 percent of the 2,800 wildlife exhibitors licensed by the United States Department of Agriculture under the Animal Welfare Act meet the more comprehensive standards of AZA accreditation. The Rolling Hills Zoo is an 501(c) registered non-profit that is dedicated to wildlife conservation and educating the next generation on the importance of bio-diversity on our planet. We engage in public science education, significant conservation and animal welfare projects, and deliver the very best in animal care and welfare for our animals, while providing engaging, meaningful family oriented experiences that last a lifetime. Many of our residents have been featured in National Geographic as part of the Joel Sartore’s "Photo Ark" project. One of National Geographic's covers was of our own waxy monkey tree frog. Photo Ark was a multiyear effort for Sartore to photograph captive species and inspire people to save these animals before they disappear. For many of Earth's creatures, time is running out. Species are disappearing at an alarming rate. To motivate people to care and help stop the crisis, Sartore is creating intimate portraits of an estimated 12,000 species of birds, fish, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and invertebrates.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/willa-cather-foundation.jpeg
National Willa Cather Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rollinghillszoo.jpeg
Rolling Hills Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Willa Cather Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rolling Hills Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Willa Cather Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rolling Hills Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — National Willa Cather Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Willa Cather Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rolling Hills Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rolling Hills Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/willa-cather-foundation.jpeg
National Willa Cather Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rollinghillszoo.jpeg
Rolling Hills Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rolling Hills Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Willa Cather Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rolling Hills Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Willa Cather Center company.

In the current year, Rolling Hills Zoo company and National Willa Cather Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rolling Hills Zoo company nor National Willa Cather Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rolling Hills Zoo company nor National Willa Cather Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rolling Hills Zoo company nor National Willa Cather Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Willa Cather Center company nor Rolling Hills Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Willa Cather Center company nor Rolling Hills Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rolling Hills Zoo company employs more people globally than National Willa Cather Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Willa Cather Center nor Rolling Hills Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N