Comparison Overview

WIJeindhoven

VS

Rotaract Brasil

WIJeindhoven

Torenallee 20 5617 BC Eindhoven, NL
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

De zelfstandige stichting WIJeindhoven voert voor de gemeente Eindhoven verschillende eerstelijns zorgtaken uit.

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 201-500
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rotaract Brasil

Brazil, BR
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

O Rotaract é uma escola de liderança em que tudo se aprende na prática. Somos uma rede global de jovens de 18 a 30 anos que tem como principal objetivo compartilhar ideias e projetos para encarar os desafios da humanidade de uma nova maneira. Os rotaractianos se reúnem em clubes para planejar atividades e socializar entre si e sua comunidade. Com essa interação e os estímulos recebidos por meio de palestras, treinamento, encontros e workshops, eles atuam de forma crítica e consciente, buscando a sustentabilidade de suas comunidades e gerando impacto social positivo nas áreas em que atuam. E esse impacto só é possível porque o Rotaract é patrocinado pelo Rotary International, uma das maiores organizações humanitárias do mundo e que é membro da Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU).

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wijeindhoven.jpeg
WIJeindhoven
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rotaract-brasil.jpeg
Rotaract Brasil
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
WIJeindhoven
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rotaract Brasil
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WIJeindhoven in 2025.

Incidents vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rotaract Brasil in 2025.

Incident History — WIJeindhoven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WIJeindhoven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rotaract Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rotaract Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wijeindhoven.jpeg
WIJeindhoven
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rotaract-brasil.jpeg
Rotaract Brasil
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both WIJeindhoven company and Rotaract Brasil company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Rotaract Brasil company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WIJeindhoven company.

In the current year, Rotaract Brasil company and WIJeindhoven company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rotaract Brasil company nor WIJeindhoven company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rotaract Brasil company nor WIJeindhoven company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rotaract Brasil company nor WIJeindhoven company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WIJeindhoven company nor Rotaract Brasil company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WIJeindhoven company nor Rotaract Brasil company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither WIJeindhoven company nor Rotaract Brasil company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.