Comparison Overview

Wiener Staatsoper

VS

Charleston Symphony

Wiener Staatsoper

Opernring 2, Wien, undefined, 1010, AT
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Die Wiener Staatsoper zählt zu den international bedeutendsten Opernhäusern der Welt. Die Spielzeit geht von September bis Juni und bietet über 300 Vorstellungen von mehr als 60 verschiedenen Opern- und Ballettwerken. Die künstlerischen Eckpfeiler dieses Opernhauses sind das Staatsopernorchester/die Wiener Philharmoniker, das Bühnenorchester, der Chor sowie das fest engagierte SängerInnenensemble und das Ballett-Ensemble. Hinzu kommen internationale Gast-SängerInnen, -TänzerInnen und DirigentInnen. Insgesamt arbeiten am Haus am Ring rund 950 feste MitarbeiterInnen, inklusive Technik, Direktion und Verwaltung.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 342
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Charleston Symphony

480 East Bay Street, Charleston, SC, 29403, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Founded in 1936, the Charleston Symphony has grown into one of the largest full-time performing arts organizations in South Carolina. The CSO presents more than 150 concerts and educational activities every year, reaching more than 50,000 adults and students annually. Employing 36 full-time musicians, artistic personnel, and administrative staff, the Charleston Symphony’s mission is to inspire and engage our community through exceptional musical experiences and educational offerings.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wiener-staatsoper.jpeg
Wiener Staatsoper
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Charleston Symphony
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wiener Staatsoper
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charleston Symphony
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wiener Staatsoper in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charleston Symphony in 2025.

Incident History — Wiener Staatsoper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wiener Staatsoper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charleston Symphony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charleston Symphony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wiener-staatsoper.jpeg
Wiener Staatsoper
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Charleston Symphony
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wiener Staatsoper company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charleston Symphony company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charleston Symphony company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wiener Staatsoper company.

In the current year, Charleston Symphony company and Wiener Staatsoper company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charleston Symphony company nor Wiener Staatsoper company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charleston Symphony company nor Wiener Staatsoper company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charleston Symphony company nor Wiener Staatsoper company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper company nor Charleston Symphony company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper nor Charleston Symphony holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper company nor Charleston Symphony company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wiener Staatsoper company employs more people globally than Charleston Symphony company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper nor Charleston Symphony holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper nor Charleston Symphony holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper nor Charleston Symphony holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper nor Charleston Symphony holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper nor Charleston Symphony holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wiener Staatsoper nor Charleston Symphony holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N