Comparison Overview

Wi-Tronix

VS

Oy Tamware AB

Wi-Tronix

631 E. Boughton Rd., Bolingbrook, IL, 60440, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

By enabling continuous improvement with a powerful combination of connectivity, analytics, alerts and more, Wi-Tronix is empowering freight, passenger and transit system railways to improve safety, increase efficiency, and enhance service reliability. We deliver advanced IoT platforms that provide actionable information and insights on how rail networks are performing in real-time. Cloud-based data security, business intelligence such as fuel monitoring and refueling optimization, and 24/7/365 customer service set Wi-Tronix apart. We combine edge processing with Visual Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning to detect and interpret actionable Information. The Wi-Tronix team is passionately committed to its global vision of saving lives and ensuring the most efficient and reliable movement of goods and people throughout the world. Find out more about Wi-Tronix at www2.wi-tronix.com or contact us at [email protected].

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 192
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oy Tamware AB

Yrittäjänkulma 5, Tampere, FI-33710, FI
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Decades of experience in product development with customers have placed the company in the top drawer globally. Since 2008, our main focus has been on designing, developing and producing electronic door systems. Our goal is to provide our customers with a comprehensive partnership, working with them from design to maintenance. We look after our clients, even after delivery. We aim to develop long-term cooperation. Our headquarters and production site are located in Tampere, Finland.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wi-tronix-llc.jpeg
Wi-Tronix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oy-tamware-ab.jpeg
Oy Tamware AB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wi-Tronix
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oy Tamware AB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wi-Tronix in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oy Tamware AB in 2025.

Incident History — Wi-Tronix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wi-Tronix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oy Tamware AB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oy Tamware AB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wi-tronix-llc.jpeg
Wi-Tronix
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oy-tamware-ab.jpeg
Oy Tamware AB
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wi-Tronix company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oy Tamware AB company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oy Tamware AB company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wi-Tronix company.

In the current year, Oy Tamware AB company and Wi-Tronix company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oy Tamware AB company nor Wi-Tronix company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oy Tamware AB company nor Wi-Tronix company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oy Tamware AB company nor Wi-Tronix company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wi-Tronix company nor Oy Tamware AB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wi-Tronix nor Oy Tamware AB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wi-Tronix company nor Oy Tamware AB company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wi-Tronix company employs more people globally than Oy Tamware AB company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Wi-Tronix nor Oy Tamware AB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wi-Tronix nor Oy Tamware AB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wi-Tronix nor Oy Tamware AB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wi-Tronix nor Oy Tamware AB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wi-Tronix nor Oy Tamware AB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wi-Tronix nor Oy Tamware AB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H