Comparison Overview

Whitney Museum of American Art

VS

Balboa Park Cultural Partnership

Whitney Museum of American Art

99 Gansevoort Street, New York, New York, 10014, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.whitney.org

The Whitney seeks to be the defining museum of 20th- and 21st-century American art. The Museum collects, exhibits, preserves, researches, and interprets art of the United States in the broadest global, historical and interdisciplinary contexts. As the preeminent advocate for American art, we foster the work of living artists at critical moments in their careers. The Whitney educates a diverse public through direct interaction with artists, often before their work has achieved general acceptance. See the latest job and internship postings on our website here: https://whitney.org/about/job-postings

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 505
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Balboa Park Cultural Partnership

1549 El Prado, San Diego, California, US, 92101
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bpcp.org

The Balboa Park Cultural Partnership is a nonprofit organization through which 26 arts, science and cultural institutions in Balboa Park, San Diego, collaborate to achieve greater organizational efficiency, innovation and excellence. The Partnership’s member institutions vary in size and type and include museums, performing arts groups and theatres, cultural centers, gardens and the San Diego Zoo. The Partnership was formed in 2003 to provide a means for members to identify and achieve collective goals and to speak with one voice on issues of mutual benefit and importance. The Board of Directors is comprised of executive directors of member institutions. Park staff, trustees and volunteers participate in the development and implementation of Partnership programs — Sustainability Program, Learning Institute, Park Pass, Art of Science Learning, and more. Check out bpcp.org for future learning opportunities!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitney-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
Whitney Museum of American Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balboa-park-cultural-partnership.jpeg
Balboa Park Cultural Partnership
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whitney Museum of American Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Balboa Park Cultural Partnership
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whitney Museum of American Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Balboa Park Cultural Partnership in 2025.

Incident History — Whitney Museum of American Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whitney Museum of American Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Balboa Park Cultural Partnership (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Balboa Park Cultural Partnership cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitney-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
Whitney Museum of American Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balboa-park-cultural-partnership.jpeg
Balboa Park Cultural Partnership
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Whitney Museum of American Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Whitney Museum of American Art company.

In the current year, Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company and Whitney Museum of American Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company nor Whitney Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company nor Whitney Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company nor Whitney Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art company nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art company nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Whitney Museum of American Art company employs more people globally than Balboa Park Cultural Partnership company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whitney Museum of American Art nor Balboa Park Cultural Partnership holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References