Comparison Overview

Whitman Communications

VS

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install

Whitman Communications

10 Water Street, Lebanon, NH, US, 03766
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.whitman.biz

Whitman Communications is engaged with customers who need to have their marketing messages received and acted upon whether that is producing and mailing postcards that create opportunities on our customers' web sites or producing books for sale and then selling them on our own web site and distribution center. Although we still do all the standard printing products such as envelopes, letterheads, business cards and posters we offer a fast and convenient web ordering system to keep costs low for our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install

6950 Hall St, Holland, Ohio, 43528, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cgs-imaging.com

CGS Imaging is a full-service graphics manufacturer, specializing in wide format and grand format imaging applications. As a leader in the digital printing industry, we enlist the latest techniques, materials and technologies to help our clients achieve maximum impact. Our team at CGS Imaging relies on expertise and experience to provide quick turnaround and extremely competitive pricing, without sacrificing the exceptional quality and customer service we are known for delivering.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitman-communications.jpeg
Whitman Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgs-imaging.jpeg
CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whitman Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whitman Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install in 2025.

Incident History — Whitman Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whitman Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitman-communications.jpeg
Whitman Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgs-imaging.jpeg
CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Whitman Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Whitman Communications company.

In the current year, CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company and Whitman Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company nor Whitman Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company nor Whitman Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company nor Whitman Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whitman Communications company nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whitman Communications nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Whitman Communications company nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company employs more people globally than Whitman Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Whitman Communications nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References