Comparison Overview

Whitman Communications

VS

Ashley Printers

Whitman Communications

10 Water Street, Lebanon, NH, US, 03766
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Whitman Communications is engaged with customers who need to have their marketing messages received and acted upon whether that is producing and mailing postcards that create opportunities on our customers' web sites or producing books for sale and then selling them on our own web site and distribution center. Although we still do all the standard printing products such as envelopes, letterheads, business cards and posters we offer a fast and convenient web ordering system to keep costs low for our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ashley Printers

77 Grice Street, Clontarf, 4019, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Ashley Printers provides quality print and design solutions for small and large businesses using state-of-the-art offset and digital presses. We supply business cards, all printed promotional material including brochures, flyers, mailing cards, letterheads, carbonless docket books, order pads, note pads, booklets and catalogues. Our graphic design team will work closely with you to find the best possible branding solutions for your company from designing business cards, stationery and any promotional material; or even a new company logo.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitman-communications.jpeg
Whitman Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ashley-printers.jpeg
Ashley Printers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whitman Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ashley Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whitman Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ashley Printers in 2025.

Incident History — Whitman Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whitman Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ashley Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ashley Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitman-communications.jpeg
Whitman Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ashley-printers.jpeg
Ashley Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Whitman Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ashley Printers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ashley Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Whitman Communications company.

In the current year, Ashley Printers company and Whitman Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ashley Printers company nor Whitman Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ashley Printers company nor Whitman Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ashley Printers company nor Whitman Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whitman Communications company nor Ashley Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whitman Communications nor Ashley Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Whitman Communications company nor Ashley Printers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Whitman Communications company employs more people globally than Ashley Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Whitman Communications nor Ashley Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor Ashley Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor Ashley Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor Ashley Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor Ashley Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whitman Communications nor Ashley Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N