Comparison Overview

Whites

VS

Next Printing

Whites

Front Street, Durham, DH6 1NE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Whites is a Commercial Printers in County Durham, originally founded and operated by the current Managing Director's grandfather, William Henry White, from his garden shed. The operation was mothballed during the second world war and was brought back into operation thereafter. The company relocated in the 1960's to it's current location where the managing director's father was in charge and now the company is controlled by the third generation of the White family. We provide a wide range of print and by using the latest technology and machinery we are able to accomplish most customer's requests in-house by our seven knowledgeable members of staff who have a combined 135 years experience in the printing industry with this company alone.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Next Printing

3-5/2 Burrrows Rd South, St Peters, NSW, 2044, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Imagine a world where there are no limits on what you can create. Where any idea can become a masterpiece; where you are guided through every step. Welcome to Next Printing – where an artwork becomes a masterpiece. Next is Australia's leading large format digital printing company — your destination for exceptional colour, innovative print materials and unmatched graphic solutions. Our commitment to quality customer service and investment in the latest digital technology combines with our years of experience to transform your next artwork into a work of art.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whites.jpeg
Whites
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whites
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Next Printing
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whites in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Next Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Whites (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whites cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Next Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Next Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whites.jpeg
Whites
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/next-printing.jpeg
Next Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Whites company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Next Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Next Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Whites company.

In the current year, Next Printing company and Whites company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Next Printing company nor Whites company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Next Printing company nor Whites company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Next Printing company nor Whites company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whites company nor Next Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whites nor Next Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Whites company nor Next Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Whites company employs more people globally than Next Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Whites nor Next Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whites nor Next Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whites nor Next Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whites nor Next Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whites nor Next Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whites nor Next Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N