Comparison Overview

Whiteline Group Ltd

VS

The apt Group

Whiteline Group Ltd

26-36 Hawthorn Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN23 6QA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1983, we are the largest independent fabricator of PVCu windows and doors in the South East. From our factory in Eastbourne we supply and support our customers throughout London, the South East and beyond. We work with our customers, in partnership, delivering the right British made products, services and support to grow their business. Listening, learning and understanding how we can actively help them to succeed. Are you looking for a different type of supplier that can deliver a different type of relationship? A full range of energy efficient windows, conservatories , doors and accessories? Market leading specifications and the PlatinumNRG brand to promote them?

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The apt Group

Elizabeth St, Surry Hills, 2010, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The apt Group provides mechanical and electrical engineering solutions to a broad range of industries throughout Australasia, including Mining & Construction, Energy, Metals, Pulp & Paper, Food & Beverage, Transport, FM and OEM’s. Specialising in machine condition monitoring, our team of experts has years of experience in predictive maintenance, fault diagnostics and reliability improvement. As an Australian based group partnered with international suppliers, we provide world-class products and services to optimise mid to large scale system installations. The apt Group is committed to delivering clients a standardised, safe and measurable service on every site. Take a look at our products and services online to learn more about how we can save you money - www.aptgroup.com.au

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whiteline-group-ltd.jpeg
Whiteline Group Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-apt-group.jpeg
The apt Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whiteline Group Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The apt Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whiteline Group Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The apt Group in 2025.

Incident History — Whiteline Group Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whiteline Group Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The apt Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The apt Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whiteline-group-ltd.jpeg
Whiteline Group Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-apt-group.jpeg
The apt Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Whiteline Group Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The apt Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The apt Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Whiteline Group Ltd company.

In the current year, The apt Group company and Whiteline Group Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The apt Group company nor Whiteline Group Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The apt Group company nor Whiteline Group Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The apt Group company nor Whiteline Group Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd company nor The apt Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor The apt Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd company nor The apt Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Whiteline Group Ltd company employs more people globally than The apt Group company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor The apt Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor The apt Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor The apt Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor The apt Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor The apt Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor The apt Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H