Comparison Overview

Whiteline Group Ltd

VS

ALACRIANT, INC.

Whiteline Group Ltd

26-36 Hawthorn Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN23 6QA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1983, we are the largest independent fabricator of PVCu windows and doors in the South East. From our factory in Eastbourne we supply and support our customers throughout London, the South East and beyond. We work with our customers, in partnership, delivering the right British made products, services and support to grow their business. Listening, learning and understanding how we can actively help them to succeed. Are you looking for a different type of supplier that can deliver a different type of relationship? A full range of energy efficient windows, conservatories , doors and accessories? Market leading specifications and the PlatinumNRG brand to promote them?

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ALACRIANT, INC.

1760 MILLER PARKWAY, STREETSBORO, Ohio, 44241, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Alacriant Inc. is a manufacturer of stamped and fabricated metal assemblies serving the commercial, defense, and aerospace industries. We have two locations in Streetsboro and Cuyahoga Heights, Ohio; totaling 150,000 square feet with state-of-the-art laser cutting, bending, welding, punching, and stamping equipment. With more than 120 skilled personnel, Alacriant’s goal is to consistently execute outcomes critical to its customers’ success. As an ISO9001, AS9100, NADCAP, & ITAR certified company with an excellent training program and safety as our top priority. Alacriant employees are part of a team that pays the closest attention to every detail of every product produced and shipped from our facilities. We strive to be the first choice for customers seeking an outcome-driven metal fabrication manufacturer committed to excellence! Our Core Values: Safety, Accountability, Customer-Focused, Respect, and Teamwork.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whiteline-group-ltd.jpeg
Whiteline Group Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alacriant-inc..jpeg
ALACRIANT, INC.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whiteline Group Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ALACRIANT, INC.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whiteline Group Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALACRIANT, INC. in 2025.

Incident History — Whiteline Group Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whiteline Group Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ALACRIANT, INC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALACRIANT, INC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whiteline-group-ltd.jpeg
Whiteline Group Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alacriant-inc..jpeg
ALACRIANT, INC.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Whiteline Group Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ALACRIANT, INC. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ALACRIANT, INC. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Whiteline Group Ltd company.

In the current year, ALACRIANT, INC. company and Whiteline Group Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ALACRIANT, INC. company nor Whiteline Group Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ALACRIANT, INC. company nor Whiteline Group Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ALACRIANT, INC. company nor Whiteline Group Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd company nor ALACRIANT, INC. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor ALACRIANT, INC. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd company nor ALACRIANT, INC. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ALACRIANT, INC. company employs more people globally than Whiteline Group Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor ALACRIANT, INC. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor ALACRIANT, INC. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor ALACRIANT, INC. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor ALACRIANT, INC. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor ALACRIANT, INC. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd nor ALACRIANT, INC. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H