Comparison Overview

White Room Automation

VS

OPW Fuel Management Systems

White Room Automation

undefined, Edmonton, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26

We strive to fully understand the business needs behind our client's projects. We then turn that understanding into solutions that deliver true value to all stakeholders. By working with world class technologies and ensuring that we have deep technical expertise we are able to fully support projects throughout their life cycle.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OPW Fuel Management Systems

6900 Santa Fe Dr, Hodgkins, Illinois, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

OPW Fuel Management Systems (FMS) has been committed to delivering industry-leading fuel management solutions since 1961. With automated fuel control systems, a comprehensive line of integrated tank monitoring equipment and user-friendly fuel management software, OPW FMS’ family of fuel management products enable site operators to effectively and efficiently manage their fuel inventories. OPW FMS is part of Dover Fueling Solutions.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-room-automation.jpeg
White Room Automation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opw-fuel-management-systems.jpeg
OPW Fuel Management Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
White Room Automation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OPW Fuel Management Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White Room Automation in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OPW Fuel Management Systems in 2025.

Incident History — White Room Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

White Room Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OPW Fuel Management Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPW Fuel Management Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-room-automation.jpeg
White Room Automation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opw-fuel-management-systems.jpeg
OPW Fuel Management Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

White Room Automation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OPW Fuel Management Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OPW Fuel Management Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to White Room Automation company.

In the current year, OPW Fuel Management Systems company and White Room Automation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OPW Fuel Management Systems company nor White Room Automation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OPW Fuel Management Systems company nor White Room Automation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OPW Fuel Management Systems company nor White Room Automation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither White Room Automation company nor OPW Fuel Management Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither White Room Automation nor OPW Fuel Management Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

OPW Fuel Management Systems company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to White Room Automation company.

OPW Fuel Management Systems company employs more people globally than White Room Automation company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither White Room Automation nor OPW Fuel Management Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither White Room Automation nor OPW Fuel Management Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither White Room Automation nor OPW Fuel Management Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither White Room Automation nor OPW Fuel Management Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither White Room Automation nor OPW Fuel Management Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither White Room Automation nor OPW Fuel Management Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H