Comparison Overview

White River Academy

VS

Rolling Hills Hospital

White River Academy

275 W 100 S Rd, , Delta, 84624, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

White River Academy is a leading Residential Treatment Center for adolescent boys ages 12 to 18. Our highly experienced team of Medical Professionals, Therapists, Teachers and Staff Members partner with families to help their sons heal through a wide range of trauma, compulsions and or addictions. Our goal is to provide invaluable life skills, lasting recovery support, academic discipline and hope for your son. If your son is struggling with issues related to sexual addiction, compulsive sexual behavior, technology or pornography addiction and trauma, there is hope and experienced help available.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rolling Hills Hospital

1000 Rolling Hills Ln, Ada, OK 74820, US
Last Update: 2026-01-05

Allow a Brighter Tomorrow to Start Today Nestled in the rural town of Ada, Oklahoma, Rolling Hills Hospital is an acute care center that supplies a variety of invaluable services to men, women, and children who live in and around the Ada area. This world class center offers supportive and life-changing services in an atmosphere of respect that upholds the dignity of each person who comes for treatment. Adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 can participate in Rolling Hills's inpatient care to heal and overcome numerous mental health and behavioral health concerns while taking part in the following treatment methods: • Crisis stabilization services • Medications management services • Individual, group, and family therapy • Recreational and expressive therapy • Education services Furthermore, this high quality hospital also supplies services for individuals over the age of 18 so that adult men and women can work through and recover from mental health and substance abuse issues as well. Among the other programs offered at Rolling Hills Hospital, the following are those available to adults and senior adults in need of exemplary behavioral healthcare: • Adult inpatient mental health services • Adult inpatient substance abuse treatment • Adult inpatient dual diagnosis treatment • Geriatric inpatient care • Specialized services for those with intellectual disabilities All services available, regardless of the age and presenting concerns of the person, are customized to meet the needs of each individual so that the most favorable treatment outcomes result. For more information about Rolling Hills Hospital, including the specifics of a particular program, call (877) 978-1833 or visit www.rollinghillshospital.com at your earliest convenience.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-river-academy.jpeg
White River Academy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rolling-hills-hospital-llc.jpeg
Rolling Hills Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
White River Academy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rolling Hills Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White River Academy in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rolling Hills Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — White River Academy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

White River Academy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rolling Hills Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rolling Hills Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-river-academy.jpeg
White River Academy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rolling-hills-hospital-llc.jpeg
Rolling Hills Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

White River Academy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rolling Hills Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rolling Hills Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas White River Academy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rolling Hills Hospital company and White River Academy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rolling Hills Hospital company nor White River Academy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Rolling Hills Hospital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while White River Academy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rolling Hills Hospital company nor White River Academy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither White River Academy company nor Rolling Hills Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither White River Academy nor Rolling Hills Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rolling Hills Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to White River Academy company.

Rolling Hills Hospital company employs more people globally than White River Academy company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither White River Academy nor Rolling Hills Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither White River Academy nor Rolling Hills Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither White River Academy nor Rolling Hills Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither White River Academy nor Rolling Hills Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither White River Academy nor Rolling Hills Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither White River Academy nor Rolling Hills Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N