Comparison Overview

WhiteOak

VS

Jaguar Graphics

WhiteOak

1180 Dillerville Rd, Lancaster, 17601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

WhiteOak is an established leader in print and non-print related marketing communications and promotional products. We focus on client needs. We listen to our clients and determine the best solution to accommodate their needs. Our commitment to our clients is to utilize our technologies and expertise to create more relevant business communications, reduce client costs and provide streamlined business solutions. A partial list of solutions include: marketing solutions, web-to-print, storefront solutions, digital asset management, digital/offset printing, large format, variable data printing, email, PURLs, QR codes, fulfillment & mailing and promotional products. WhiteOak continuously adds innovative solutions to fulfill the needs of its clients. Solutions that drive your business!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 437
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jaguar Graphics

3 Southside Rd, Danvers, Ma, 01923, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

JAGUAR Graphics is a full-service visual solutions company with a history of serving businesses in the Boston area for 25 years. Our state-of-the-art digital equipment enables us to produce full-color, custom products delivered fast, including same-day service if needed, and offer free local delivery using our own vans and drivers. You can count on us to be a reliable one-stop resource for quality business printing, mailing, large format, vehicle graphics, promotional items, and apparel. Our team of dedicated customer service and design specialists is here to assist with all your projects. JAGUAR is committed to helping you create a corporate image that will enhance your brand and increase customer confidence.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-oak-printing.jpeg
WhiteOak
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-graphics.jpeg
Jaguar Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WhiteOak
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jaguar Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WhiteOak in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jaguar Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — WhiteOak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WhiteOak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jaguar Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jaguar Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-oak-printing.jpeg
WhiteOak
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-graphics.jpeg
Jaguar Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

WhiteOak company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jaguar Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jaguar Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WhiteOak company.

In the current year, Jaguar Graphics company and WhiteOak company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jaguar Graphics company nor WhiteOak company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jaguar Graphics company nor WhiteOak company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jaguar Graphics company nor WhiteOak company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WhiteOak company nor Jaguar Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WhiteOak nor Jaguar Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither WhiteOak company nor Jaguar Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

WhiteOak company employs more people globally than Jaguar Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither WhiteOak nor Jaguar Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WhiteOak nor Jaguar Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WhiteOak nor Jaguar Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WhiteOak nor Jaguar Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WhiteOak nor Jaguar Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WhiteOak nor Jaguar Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N