Comparison Overview

White Label Studio

VS

AIGA Birmingham

White Label Studio

Business Design Centre, London, N1 0QH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

White Label is a specialist communication design studio, a team of expert designers dedicated to finishing creative ideas, a remote resource for creative agencies worldwide. You can think of White Label as your own remote design team who offer the added advantage of a broader skill set, more flexibility and considerable cost advantage. White Label provides the greatest value to creative agencies that want to increase overall productivity and profitability.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AIGA Birmingham

1678 Montgomery Hwy #140, PMB-220, Birmingham, AL, US, 35216
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

As the profession’s oldest and largest professional membership organization for design—with 70 chapters and more than 25,000 members—AIGA advances design as a professional craft, strategic advantage, and vital cultural force. From content that defines the global practice to events that connect and catalyze, we work to enhance the value and deepen the impact of design across all disciplines on business, society, and our collective future. From design fans to the profession’s leading practitioners, AIGA Birmingham members come from all backgrounds, all fields, and all levels of experience. Whether you’re a design enthusiast, student, freelance designer, in-house designer, design educator, design thinker, or a business owner, AIGA Birmingham is here to welcome you into the wider world of design.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-label-studio.jpeg
White Label Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aiga-birmingham.jpeg
AIGA Birmingham
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
White Label Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AIGA Birmingham
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White Label Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIGA Birmingham in 2025.

Incident History — White Label Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

White Label Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AIGA Birmingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIGA Birmingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-label-studio.jpeg
White Label Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aiga-birmingham.jpeg
AIGA Birmingham
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

White Label Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AIGA Birmingham company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AIGA Birmingham company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to White Label Studio company.

In the current year, AIGA Birmingham company and White Label Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AIGA Birmingham company nor White Label Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AIGA Birmingham company nor White Label Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AIGA Birmingham company nor White Label Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither White Label Studio company nor AIGA Birmingham company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither White Label Studio nor AIGA Birmingham holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither White Label Studio company nor AIGA Birmingham company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

White Label Studio company employs more people globally than AIGA Birmingham company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither White Label Studio nor AIGA Birmingham holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither White Label Studio nor AIGA Birmingham holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither White Label Studio nor AIGA Birmingham holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither White Label Studio nor AIGA Birmingham holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither White Label Studio nor AIGA Birmingham holds HIPAA certification.

Neither White Label Studio nor AIGA Birmingham holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X