Comparison Overview

White House Historical Association

VS

Butterfly Pavilion

White House Historical Association

1610 H Street NW, Washington, D.C., undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.whitehousehistory.org/

The White House Historical Association is a private non-profit educational organization with a mission to enhance the understanding and appreciation of the Executive Mansion. First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy founded the Association in 1961 to help the White House collect and exhibit the very best artifacts of American history and culture. Today, our acquisition, preservation, research, and education efforts continue through generous private donations and the sale of our books, products, and the official White House Ornament.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Butterfly Pavilion

6252 W. 104th Ave., Westminster, CO, 80020, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.butterflies.org

Butterfly Pavilion is the first stand-alone, Association of Zoos and Aquariums-accredited non-profit invertebrate zoo in the world and a leader in invertebrate knowledge, inspiration and connection. Whether it is providing unique, hands-on learning experiences in our exhibits and educational programs, conducting new research that sets the standard for zoos across the country or building innovative solutions for species and habitat conservation in countries around the world, Butterfly Pavilion is leading the way in ensuring invertebrates are protected for the future. Butterfly Pavilion exists to foster an appreciation of invertebrates by educating the public about the need to protect and care for threatened habitats globally, while conducting research for solutions in invertebrate conservation. Visit www.butterflies.org to learn more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-house-historical-association.jpeg
White House Historical Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-butterfly-pavilion.jpeg
Butterfly Pavilion
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
White House Historical Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Butterfly Pavilion
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White House Historical Association in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Butterfly Pavilion in 2026.

Incident History — White House Historical Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

White House Historical Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Butterfly Pavilion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Butterfly Pavilion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-house-historical-association.jpeg
White House Historical Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-butterfly-pavilion.jpeg
Butterfly Pavilion
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both White House Historical Association company and Butterfly Pavilion company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Butterfly Pavilion company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to White House Historical Association company.

In the current year, Butterfly Pavilion company and White House Historical Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Butterfly Pavilion company nor White House Historical Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Butterfly Pavilion company nor White House Historical Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Butterfly Pavilion company nor White House Historical Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither White House Historical Association company nor Butterfly Pavilion company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither White House Historical Association nor Butterfly Pavilion holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

White House Historical Association company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Butterfly Pavilion company.

White House Historical Association company employs more people globally than Butterfly Pavilion company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither White House Historical Association nor Butterfly Pavilion holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither White House Historical Association nor Butterfly Pavilion holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither White House Historical Association nor Butterfly Pavilion holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither White House Historical Association nor Butterfly Pavilion holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither White House Historical Association nor Butterfly Pavilion holds HIPAA certification.

Neither White House Historical Association nor Butterfly Pavilion holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References