Comparison Overview

White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd

VS

CCK Bequest Management

White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd

1 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L3 9HF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd provide legal support, assistance and advice to Litigants in Person, Businesses and Solicitors. Our services to solicitors including costs drafting and advocacy. We are able to draft and negotiate Bills of Costs for various types of case including Personal Injury, Industrial Disease, Commercial Claims, Professional Deputies and other Civil Litigation cases. We can also provide Advocacy support and services including Infant Approval Hearings, Possession Hearings and Costs Hearings.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CCK Bequest Management

321 S Main St, Providence, 02903, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Chisholm Chisholm and Kilpatrick LTD has a dedicated team of professionals focused entirely on Bequest Management, with whom our clients work closely and get to know. Our team understands the importance of planned giving and legacy gifts to non-profits and charities and is dedicated to fulfilling the wishes of your donors while maximizing your gifts and minimizing administrative costs and burdens. At CCK, our bequest management practice focuses on the following: -Facilitating the administration process, maximizing distributions, and protecting your bequest. -Recognizing potential administration issues and developing proactive solutions. -Your personalized service and access to case information. -Maintaining donor relationships for current and future generations

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-collar-legal-and-admin-ltd.jpeg
White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bequest-management-cck.jpeg
CCK Bequest Management
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CCK Bequest Management
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CCK Bequest Management in 2025.

Incident History — White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CCK Bequest Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CCK Bequest Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-collar-legal-and-admin-ltd.jpeg
White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bequest-management-cck.jpeg
CCK Bequest Management
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CCK Bequest Management company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CCK Bequest Management company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company.

In the current year, CCK Bequest Management company and White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CCK Bequest Management company nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CCK Bequest Management company nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CCK Bequest Management company nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company nor CCK Bequest Management company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd nor CCK Bequest Management holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CCK Bequest Management company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd nor CCK Bequest Management holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd nor CCK Bequest Management holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd nor CCK Bequest Management holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd nor CCK Bequest Management holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd nor CCK Bequest Management holds HIPAA certification.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd nor CCK Bequest Management holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X