Comparison Overview

Whistlejacket Studio

VS

Cooley Design Lab

Whistlejacket Studio

Vox Studios Unit N201a, London, England, SE11 5JH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

We are Whistlejacket. We solve knotty business challenges for clients using creativity and insight. We're a top ten rated agency. We believe in "Purpose'​. We help organisations define, communicate and embody the difference they make in the world. We are passionate about helping you answer one question: “Why is it good news for people that your organisation exists?”…and then making sure that everything your company does reflects and communicates that Purpose Follow us on Instagram @whistlejacket.studio

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cooley Design Lab

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Founded in New York City and currently located in Maine, Cooley Design Lab is a one-person studio that specializes in book cover and interior design, as well as packaging and poster design. Recent projects include the art direction of Hard Case Crime, a publisher of hardboiled crime fiction, as well as shaping the identity of Smithsonian Folkways Recordings’ Spanish-language music packaging.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whistlejacket-london.jpeg
Whistlejacket Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cooley Design Lab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whistlejacket Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cooley Design Lab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whistlejacket Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cooley Design Lab in 2025.

Incident History — Whistlejacket Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whistlejacket Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cooley Design Lab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cooley Design Lab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whistlejacket-london.jpeg
Whistlejacket Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cooley Design Lab
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cooley Design Lab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Whistlejacket Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cooley Design Lab company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Whistlejacket Studio company.

In the current year, Cooley Design Lab company and Whistlejacket Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cooley Design Lab company nor Whistlejacket Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cooley Design Lab company nor Whistlejacket Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cooley Design Lab company nor Whistlejacket Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio company nor Cooley Design Lab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio nor Cooley Design Lab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio company nor Cooley Design Lab company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Whistlejacket Studio company employs more people globally than Cooley Design Lab company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio nor Cooley Design Lab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio nor Cooley Design Lab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio nor Cooley Design Lab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio nor Cooley Design Lab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio nor Cooley Design Lab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whistlejacket Studio nor Cooley Design Lab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X