Comparison Overview

Whirl Publishing

VS

Baker's Exchange

Whirl Publishing

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

WHIRL Publishing consists of 4 magazines and web sites. The tremendous success of WHIRL is founded on the support of the community and the magazine's goal to showcase the best of Western Pennsylvania living. WHIRL Magazine is Western Pennsylvania's premier lifestyle magazine and promotes the people, places, and businesses that make Pittsburgh America's Most Livable City. WHIRL Wedding Guide is the most complete guide for wedding planning in Western Pennsylvania. WHIRL@Home promotes our region's local lifestyle by showcasing designers, retailers, and artisans with an emphasis on sophisticated home decor, unique real estate, and fabulous furnishings. Edible Allegheny promotes our region's local food movement, our distinct culinary styles, and our huge community of growers, producers, chefs, and food artisans. WHIRL Publishing"s family of web sites are www.whirlmagazine.com, www.whirlweddings.com, www.whirlathome.com, and www.ediblealleghenymagazine.com. Our web sites are the online resource for dining, fashion, real estate, weddings, events, sports and more. We promote exclusive giveaways, contests, daily updates, blogs, behind-the-scenes coverage, event photos and unique advertising opportunities.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Baker's Exchange

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26

BAKER’S EXCHANGE began back in 1999 as the first ad-only black and white trade magazine directed to the bakery industry. We have re-launched the magazine in a full color format, both in print and online, as a marketplace for bakery suppliers to display goods and services. It is a simple but very effective marketing vehicle

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whirl-publishing.jpeg
Whirl Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker's-exchange.jpeg
Baker's Exchange
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whirl Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baker's Exchange
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whirl Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker's Exchange in 2025.

Incident History — Whirl Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whirl Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baker's Exchange (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker's Exchange cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whirl-publishing.jpeg
Whirl Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker's-exchange.jpeg
Baker's Exchange
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baker's Exchange company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Whirl Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Baker's Exchange company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Whirl Publishing company.

In the current year, Baker's Exchange company and Whirl Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baker's Exchange company nor Whirl Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baker's Exchange company nor Whirl Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baker's Exchange company nor Whirl Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whirl Publishing company nor Baker's Exchange company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whirl Publishing nor Baker's Exchange holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Whirl Publishing company nor Baker's Exchange company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Whirl Publishing company employs more people globally than Baker's Exchange company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Whirl Publishing nor Baker's Exchange holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whirl Publishing nor Baker's Exchange holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whirl Publishing nor Baker's Exchange holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whirl Publishing nor Baker's Exchange holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whirl Publishing nor Baker's Exchange holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whirl Publishing nor Baker's Exchange holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.