Comparison Overview

When The Shoe Fits

VS

Sainsbury's

When The Shoe Fits

819 Se 160th Ave # 100, Vancouver, Washington 98683-9668, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

None

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sainsbury's

33 Holborn, London, undefined, EC1N 2HT, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Over 150 years old and still going strong, weโ€™re the UKโ€™s second-biggest retailer. Every day, the nation shops with us because they know theyโ€™ll get affordable, good food and excellent service. We focus on great value and convenient shopping across our family of brands, from Argos, Nectar and Habitat to Sainsburyโ€™s Bank, Smart Charge and Tu. Whatโ€™s next for Sainsburyโ€™s? We've put food back at the heart of our business and weโ€™re taking Sainsburyโ€™s to the next level. Weโ€™re investing in technology and people and weโ€™re thinking bigger about how we attract and connect with our customers, while doing everything we can to create a more resilient UK food system.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 64,770
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/when-the-shoe-fits.jpeg
When The Shoe Fits
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sainsburys.jpeg
Sainsbury's
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
When The Shoe Fits
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sainsbury's
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for When The Shoe Fits in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sainsbury's in 2025.

Incident History โ€” When The Shoe Fits (X = Date, Y = Severity)

When The Shoe Fits cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Sainsbury's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sainsbury's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/when-the-shoe-fits.jpeg
When The Shoe Fits
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sainsburys.jpeg
Sainsbury's
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party Vendor Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2010
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unencrypted Emails
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both When The Shoe Fits company and Sainsbury's company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Sainsbury's company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas When The Shoe Fits company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sainsbury's company and When The Shoe Fits company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sainsbury's company nor When The Shoe Fits company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sainsbury's company has disclosed at least one data breach, while When The Shoe Fits company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sainsbury's company nor When The Shoe Fits company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither When The Shoe Fits company nor Sainsbury's company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Sainsbury's company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to When The Shoe Fits company.

Sainsbury's company employs more people globally than When The Shoe Fits company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X