Comparison Overview

When The Shoe Fits

VS

Dollarama L.P.

When The Shoe Fits

819 Se 160th Ave # 100, Vancouver, Washington 98683-9668, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

None

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dollarama L.P.

5805 Royalmount, Mont-Royal, Quรฉbec, H4P 0A1, CA
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Dollarama was founded by third-generation retailer and Canadian entrepreneur, Larry Rossy. It all started with one store, in Matane, Quebec, in 1992, and quickly grew over the next two decades to become a household name and shopping destination for Canadians from coast to coast. Dollarama today is a recognized Canadian value retailer with well over 1,300 locations, led by Neil Rossy, fourth-generation retailer and member of Dollaramaโ€™s founding management team. Dollarama aims to provide customers with a consistent shopping experience and compelling value, offering a broad assortment of general merchandise, consumables and seasonal items. All stores are corporately-owned and operated, and are conveniently located in metropolitan areas, mid-sized cities and small towns. Products are available in individual or multiple units at low, fixed price points.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,003
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/when-the-shoe-fits.jpeg
When The Shoe Fits
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dollarama.jpeg
Dollarama L.P.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
When The Shoe Fits
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dollarama L.P.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for When The Shoe Fits in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dollarama L.P. in 2025.

Incident History โ€” When The Shoe Fits (X = Date, Y = Severity)

When The Shoe Fits cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Dollarama L.P. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dollarama L.P. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/when-the-shoe-fits.jpeg
When The Shoe Fits
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dollarama.jpeg
Dollarama L.P.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

When The Shoe Fits company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Dollarama L.P. company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dollarama L.P. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to When The Shoe Fits company.

In the current year, Dollarama L.P. company and When The Shoe Fits company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dollarama L.P. company nor When The Shoe Fits company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dollarama L.P. company nor When The Shoe Fits company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dollarama L.P. company nor When The Shoe Fits company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither When The Shoe Fits company nor Dollarama L.P. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither When The Shoe Fits company nor Dollarama L.P. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dollarama L.P. company employs more people globally than When The Shoe Fits company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X