Comparison Overview

Wharf Industries Printing

VS

C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing

Wharf Industries Printing

3 Lexington Road, Windham, NH, 03087, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

At Wharf Industries Printing, our team provides high-quality printing and direct mail services with exceptional customer service at competitive prices. We pride ourselves on outstanding quality and service. No job is too small or project too large. We handle it all – from design to production – with delivery to meet your schedule and exceed your expectations. We offer direct mail service and inventory storage, as well as a wide range of print-related products and services: • 4-color process • graphic design • business cards • letterhead • envelopes • postcards • newsletters • pocket folders • yard signs • booklets • door hangers • rack cards • calendars • menus • banners • posters • flyers • brochures • promotional items • customized digital storefronts • and much more Speed, Quality and Value

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing

undefined, La Crescenta, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

C&M Printing, Copying, Mailiing is a leader in Print and Graphic Communications in the Crescenta Valley - Foothills and North East San Fernando Valley. For over 30 years we have built lasting Relationships through Reliability and Respect, for our clients, our team and our community. Over the past few years, we have challenged ourselves to become more than your print, copy and mailing company expanding into multiple marketing channels. C&M partners with many of our clients on creative planning and is a hub of solutions for businesses and organizations. Our friendly, professional staff is ready to help on your next project. From concept, design, print, mailing and marketing services, we support you in producing high quality results. Visit our website at www.cmprintmail.com or call us at 818-353-7135.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wharf-industries-printing.jpeg
Wharf Industries Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c&m-printing-copying-mailing.jpeg
C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wharf Industries Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wharf Industries Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing in 2025.

Incident History — Wharf Industries Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wharf Industries Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wharf-industries-printing.jpeg
Wharf Industries Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c&m-printing-copying-mailing.jpeg
C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wharf Industries Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wharf Industries Printing company.

In the current year, C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company and Wharf Industries Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company nor Wharf Industries Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company nor Wharf Industries Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company nor Wharf Industries Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing company nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing company nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wharf Industries Printing company employs more people globally than C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wharf Industries Printing nor C&M Printing, Copying, Mailing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N