Comparison Overview

Ideal Printing

VS

Tepel Brothers Printing

Ideal Printing

400 S Nine Mound Rd, Verona, WI, 53593, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Our print shop is a full service printer, which means we can do just about anything. In addition to printing we provide the following services to help you complete your project. • Booklet Binding • Cutting • Design & Document Creation • Digital Output of Files • Drilling Holes • Foil Stamping • Folding • Numbering • Perforation • Pickup and Delivery • Scanning • Scoring and Slitting • Shipping and Delivery • Shrink Wrapping • Stapling

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tepel Brothers Printing

None, None, None, None, US, 48083
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Tepel Brothers Printing Company Since our humble beginning in 1989, in an 800 square foot garage, Tepel Brothers Printing Company has had a simple, yet important philosophy: to provide the finest printing to our customers at a competitive price. We have accomplished this goal by never losing sight of the critical need to constantly re-invest in our equipment and facility and to treat our customers as partners in the printing process. Today we have become the most technologically advanced sheetfed printer in southeast Michigan.  Together with our award winning quality and our vast capabilities, we can offer the more than 1000 clients that we have served a resource for commercial sheetfed printing like no other. Tepel Brothers Printing Company has truly become southeast Michigan’s Premier printer. 

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wh-printing-inc..jpeg
Ideal Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tepel-brothers-printing.jpeg
Tepel Brothers Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ideal Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tepel Brothers Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ideal Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tepel Brothers Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Ideal Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ideal Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tepel Brothers Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tepel Brothers Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wh-printing-inc..jpeg
Ideal Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tepel-brothers-printing.jpeg
Tepel Brothers Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ideal Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tepel Brothers Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tepel Brothers Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ideal Printing company.

In the current year, Tepel Brothers Printing company and Ideal Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tepel Brothers Printing company nor Ideal Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tepel Brothers Printing company nor Ideal Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tepel Brothers Printing company nor Ideal Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ideal Printing company nor Tepel Brothers Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ideal Printing nor Tepel Brothers Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ideal Printing company nor Tepel Brothers Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tepel Brothers Printing company employs more people globally than Ideal Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Ideal Printing nor Tepel Brothers Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ideal Printing nor Tepel Brothers Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ideal Printing nor Tepel Brothers Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ideal Printing nor Tepel Brothers Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ideal Printing nor Tepel Brothers Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ideal Printing nor Tepel Brothers Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N