Comparison Overview

Westmark Labels & Marking

VS

The Oldham Group

Westmark Labels & Marking

6701 SW McEwan Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97035, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.westmarklm.com

Westmark Industries has been a leader in the labeling and marking business since 1982. We specialize in helping customers throughout the Northwest find solutions to their product identification needs. Headquartered in a 50,000 square foot facility near Portland in Lake Oswego, Oregon, we have seven branch locations serving customers as far away as Alaska and Hawaii. Our customers range from small companies to large corporations seeking labeling and marking expertise. We take great pride in applying current technologies to help our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Oldham Group

2056 N Republic St, Springfield, Illinois, 62702, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://www.oldhamgroup.com

Oldham Graphic Supply was established in Springfield, IL in 1951 under the name of its founder-Arch Oldham. The initial focus was on printing supplies, Oldham now serves multiple channels of the print industry including Offset, Flexo, Wide Format and Finishing Equipment. As the industry continued to evolve and grow, The Oldham Group formed the digital and electronics division, offering expert assistance in automated workflow solutions, digital asset management, workstations, servers, and networking solutions. Oldham’s experienced team of field representatives along with our knowledgeable CSRs have the hands-on knowledge of the tools to keep you running. Oldham Group your one source print partner…

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westmarklm.jpeg
Westmark Labels & Marking
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-oldham-group.jpeg
The Oldham Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Westmark Labels & Marking
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Oldham Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Westmark Labels & Marking in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Oldham Group in 2025.

Incident History — Westmark Labels & Marking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Westmark Labels & Marking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Oldham Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Oldham Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westmarklm.jpeg
Westmark Labels & Marking
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-oldham-group.jpeg
The Oldham Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Westmark Labels & Marking company and The Oldham Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Oldham Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Westmark Labels & Marking company.

In the current year, The Oldham Group company and Westmark Labels & Marking company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Oldham Group company nor Westmark Labels & Marking company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Oldham Group company nor Westmark Labels & Marking company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Oldham Group company nor Westmark Labels & Marking company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking company nor The Oldham Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor The Oldham Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking company nor The Oldham Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Oldham Group company employs more people globally than Westmark Labels & Marking company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor The Oldham Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor The Oldham Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor The Oldham Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor The Oldham Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor The Oldham Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor The Oldham Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References