Comparison Overview

Westmark Labels & Marking

VS

B&D Litho California, Inc.

Westmark Labels & Marking

6701 SW McEwan Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97035, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.westmarklm.com

Westmark Industries has been a leader in the labeling and marking business since 1982. We specialize in helping customers throughout the Northwest find solutions to their product identification needs. Headquartered in a 50,000 square foot facility near Portland in Lake Oswego, Oregon, we have seven branch locations serving customers as far away as Alaska and Hawaii. Our customers range from small companies to large corporations seeking labeling and marking expertise. We take great pride in applying current technologies to help our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

B&D Litho California, Inc.

325 N Ponderosa Ave, Ontario, CA, 91761, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://bndlithoca.com

B&D has been a successful trade printer for more than 50 years. Our growing commercial plant here in Ontario California is known for high quality, quick turnarounds and great customer service. Our customers feel secure in dealing with us not only because we print exclusively for the trade, but because our balance sheet is among the strongest of all the printers in Southern California. Our equipment includes 2 full web heatset webs and one heatset half web. We also have an 8-color UV web for cut sheets, continuous and roll-to-roll jobs. Unlike other printers, our bindery is not a bottleneck. We have 3 saddle stitchers, 3 cutters and 7 folders working three shifts, so work flies off the presses and out the door.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westmarklm.jpeg
Westmark Labels & Marking
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/b&d-litho-california-inc-.jpeg
B&D Litho California, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Westmark Labels & Marking
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
B&D Litho California, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Westmark Labels & Marking in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B&D Litho California, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Westmark Labels & Marking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Westmark Labels & Marking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — B&D Litho California, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B&D Litho California, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/westmarklm.jpeg
Westmark Labels & Marking
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/b&d-litho-california-inc-.jpeg
B&D Litho California, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

B&D Litho California, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Westmark Labels & Marking company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, B&D Litho California, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Westmark Labels & Marking company.

In the current year, B&D Litho California, Inc. company and Westmark Labels & Marking company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither B&D Litho California, Inc. company nor Westmark Labels & Marking company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither B&D Litho California, Inc. company nor Westmark Labels & Marking company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither B&D Litho California, Inc. company nor Westmark Labels & Marking company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking company nor B&D Litho California, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor B&D Litho California, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking company nor B&D Litho California, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Westmark Labels & Marking company employs more people globally than B&D Litho California, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor B&D Litho California, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor B&D Litho California, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor B&D Litho California, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor B&D Litho California, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor B&D Litho California, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Westmark Labels & Marking nor B&D Litho California, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References