Comparison Overview

Western Australian Museum

VS

Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College

Western Australian Museum

Perth Cultural Centre, James Street Perth , Perth , 6000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.museum.wa.gov.au

The Western Australian Museum was established in 1891 (as the ‘Perth Museum’) and its initial collections were of geological, ethnological and biological specimens. Indeed, it can claim to be one of the oldest scientific institutions in the State. In 1959, its botanical collection was transferred to the new Herbarium and it continued to concentrate on earth sciences and zoology. The 1960s and 1970s saw the addition of responsibility for developing and maintaining the State’s anthropological, archaeological, maritime archaeological and social and cultural history collections. The Museum’s aim is to advocate knowledge about the collections and communicate it to the public through a variety of media, but particularly through a program of exhibitions and publications. Keep our online community safe and respectful by following our community guidelines: https://visit.museum.wa.gov.au/social-media-community-guidelines

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 270
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College

815 N Broadway, None, Saratoga Springs, New York, US, 12866-1632
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://tang.skidmore.edu

The Frances Young Tang Teaching Museum and Art Gallery at Skidmore College was founded in a visionary leap of faith. Designed by Antoine Predock and opened in 2000, its charge was to break the traditional mold of the college art museum and reinvent how a museum could play a catalytic interdisciplinary teaching role across the curriculum in a rigorous, undergraduate liberal arts education.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/western-australian-museum.jpeg
Western Australian Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tang-teaching-museum.jpeg
Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Western Australian Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Western Australian Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College in 2025.

Incident History — Western Australian Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Western Australian Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/western-australian-museum.jpeg
Western Australian Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tang-teaching-museum.jpeg
Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Western Australian Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Western Australian Museum company.

In the current year, Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company and Western Australian Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company nor Western Australian Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company nor Western Australian Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company nor Western Australian Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Western Australian Museum company nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Western Australian Museum nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Western Australian Museum company nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Western Australian Museum company employs more people globally than Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Western Australian Museum nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Western Australian Museum nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Western Australian Museum nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Western Australian Museum nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Western Australian Museum nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Western Australian Museum nor Tang Teaching Museum at Skidmore College holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References