Comparison Overview

Wesfarmers

VS

Massmart

Wesfarmers

Level 14, 123 St Georges Terrace, Perth, WA, AU, 6000
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

Wesfarmers — a diversified corporation From its origins in 1914 as a Western Australian farmers' cooperative, Wesfarmers has grown into one of Australia's largest listed companies. With headquarters in Western Australia, its diverse business operations cover: home improvement and outdoor living; apparel and general merchandise; office supplies; and an Industrials division with businesses in chemicals, energy and fertilisers, and industrial and safety products. Wesfarmers is one of Australia's largest employers and has a shareholder base of approximately 484,000. The primary objective of Wesfarmers is to provide a satisfactory return to its shareholders. The company aims to achieve this by: * satisfying the needs of customers through the provision of goods and services on a competitive and professional basis; * providing a safe and fulfilling working environment for employees, rewarding good performance and providing opportunities for advancement; * contributing to the growth and prosperity of the countries in which it operates by conducting existing operations in an efficient manner and by seeking out opportunities for expansion; * responding to the attitudes and expectations of the communities in which the company operates; * placing a strong emphasis on protection of the environment; and * acting with integrity and honesty in dealings both inside and outside the company.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 24,204
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Massmart

Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Massmart, Africa’s second largest retail group, comprises four divisions operating in 423 stores, across 13 sub- Saharan countries. Through our widely–recognised, differentiated retail and wholesale formats, we have leading shares in the General Merchandise, Liquor, Home Improvement and wholesale Food markets. Our key foundations of high volume, low cost and operational excellence enable our price leadership.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 14,168
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wesfarmers.jpeg
Wesfarmers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massmart.jpeg
Massmart
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wesfarmers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Massmart
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wesfarmers in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massmart in 2025.

Incident History — Wesfarmers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wesfarmers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Massmart (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massmart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wesfarmers.jpeg
Wesfarmers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massmart.jpeg
Massmart
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerabilities in MOVEit and Cleo file transfer software
Motivation: Data extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Wesfarmers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Massmart company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Massmart company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Wesfarmers company has not reported any.

In the current year, Massmart company has reported more cyber incidents than Wesfarmers company.

Massmart company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Wesfarmers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Massmart company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Wesfarmers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Massmart company nor Wesfarmers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wesfarmers company nor Massmart company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wesfarmers nor Massmart holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Massmart company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Wesfarmers company.

Wesfarmers company employs more people globally than Massmart company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Wesfarmers nor Massmart holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wesfarmers nor Massmart holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wesfarmers nor Massmart holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wesfarmers nor Massmart holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wesfarmers nor Massmart holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wesfarmers nor Massmart holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H