Comparison Overview

Wentworth Senior Living

VS

Aeralife

Wentworth Senior Living

346 Pleasant Street, Portsmouth, NH, US, 03801
Last Update: 2025-12-24

Located in the heart of downtown Portsmouth, NH Wentworth Senior Living is a nonprofit senior living community dedicated to ensuring ALL local seniors are receiving independence when they want it and care when they need it. Although we can provide the comprehensive healthcare services available in a nursing home, we’re anything but. Our living spaces are quiet and comfortable. Clinical support is offered, as needed, in a private, respectful manner within residents’ own apartments. Common areas remain communal, cozy, and home-like, devoid of distracting and noisy nurses’ stations. Our highly trained professional staff values the time they take to engage and build relationships with residents they genuinely respect and love. We are a hybrid provider of senior services, only one component of which is residential. Both within and beyond our physical walls, we advocate for seniors while honoring their individual strengths and capacities. As a nonprofit, our philanthropy and programming help all seniors in the community live healthy, connected lives.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aeralife

undefined, Melbourne, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

Aeralife, proudly Australian and independently owned, has over 20 years’ experience in providing premium residential aged care. Each of our homes across Victoria and New South Wales are a shining example of our innovative, holistic approach to aged care. Our highly experienced teams possess passion and empathy in equal measure. We empower them to forge deep connections with residents, ensuring a more meaningful approach to caregiving. Our mission is simple: to enable a safe and nurturing community that delights our diverse residents, families and staff. Aeralife. A new era of care.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wentworthseniorliving.jpeg
Wentworth Senior Living
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-care.jpeg
Aeralife
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wentworth Senior Living
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aeralife
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wentworth Senior Living in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aeralife in 2025.

Incident History — Wentworth Senior Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wentworth Senior Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aeralife (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aeralife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wentworthseniorliving.jpeg
Wentworth Senior Living
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-care.jpeg
Aeralife
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aeralife company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wentworth Senior Living company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aeralife company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wentworth Senior Living company.

In the current year, Aeralife company and Wentworth Senior Living company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aeralife company nor Wentworth Senior Living company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aeralife company nor Wentworth Senior Living company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aeralife company nor Wentworth Senior Living company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living company nor Aeralife company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living nor Aeralife holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living company nor Aeralife company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aeralife company employs more people globally than Wentworth Senior Living company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living nor Aeralife holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living nor Aeralife holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living nor Aeralife holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living nor Aeralife holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living nor Aeralife holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wentworth Senior Living nor Aeralife holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N