Comparison Overview

Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing

VS

Payne Publishers, Inc.

Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing

4521 Troy Hwy, Montgomery, Alabama, 36116, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wellsprinting.com/

For more than half a century, Wells has both met and exceeded the needs of our customers by offering the highest levels of quality in the industry at competitive prices. This outstanding performance has always been achieved through our commitment to excellence. Our reputation is based on a history of honesty, integrity and hard work. Wells has always been a local company devoted to the Montgomery area and its values. From the humblest of beginnings, we have grown to become an industry leader, but the values learned beginning in a cow stall still shine through in our work.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Payne Publishers, Inc.

8707 Quarry Road, Manassas, VA, 20110, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.paynepub.com

Payne Publishers, Inc. is a manufacturer of calendars, planners, journals, datebooks, and organizers for wholesale, retail, and college bookstore markets. We offer a wide variety of styles and formats for both the academic year starting in August and the calendar year beginning in January. Many products are customized or embellished for schools and corporations throughout the country. Payne Publishers, Inc. is also active in the Promotional Products market, and is an Approved Supplier for the Real Estate Advertising Industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wells-printing-co.jpeg
Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/payne-publishers-inc-.jpeg
Payne Publishers, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Payne Publishers, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Payne Publishers, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Payne Publishers, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Payne Publishers, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wells-printing-co.jpeg
Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/payne-publishers-inc-.jpeg
Payne Publishers, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company and Payne Publishers, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Payne Publishers, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company.

In the current year, Payne Publishers, Inc. company and Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. company nor Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. company nor Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. company nor Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company nor Payne Publishers, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing nor Payne Publishers, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company nor Payne Publishers, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing company employs more people globally than Payne Publishers, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing nor Payne Publishers, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing nor Payne Publishers, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing nor Payne Publishers, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing nor Payne Publishers, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing nor Payne Publishers, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wells Printing, Promotional & Mailing nor Payne Publishers, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References