Comparison Overview

Wells & Drew

VS

MidSouth Tag & Label

Wells & Drew

3414 GALILEE RD, Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wellsdrew.com

For over 165 years, Wells & Drew has been a pioneer in the printing industry, delivering first-class design, print, and paper solutions that help businesses make an unforgettable impression. As a specialty printing company, we offer a range of unique and high-impact printing techniques, including engraving, embossing, debossing, die-cutting, foil stamping, letterpress, and digital printing. Our unwavering commitment to craftsmanship, quality, and attention to detail has enabled us to consistently stand out from the competition. At Wells & Drew, we believe that every printed piece should make a lasting impression, and we strive to bring that vision to life for our clients every day.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MidSouth Tag & Label

109 Citation Ct, Birmingham, Alabama, 35209, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://midsouthtl.com

MidSouth Tag and Label provides branded tag and label solutions for industries with critical demands, such as treated and untreated lumber; windows and doors; building and landscaping products; medical devices; and material handling applications. We combine material properties, printing craftmanship, and manufacturing processes to produce highly specialized tags and labels that meet industry-specific requirements, consumer demand for product identification, and verified graphics consistency. We have served the lumber industry worldwide for more than 40 years, and are the largest manufacturer of lumber tags, placards, and bundle tags in the US. In fact, we produce millions of lumber tags every day. We also manufacturer the MidSouth Tagger™, a specialized lumber tagging system.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wells-&-drew.jpeg
Wells & Drew
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/midsouth-design.jpeg
MidSouth Tag & Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wells & Drew
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MidSouth Tag & Label
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wells & Drew in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MidSouth Tag & Label in 2025.

Incident History — Wells & Drew (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wells & Drew cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MidSouth Tag & Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MidSouth Tag & Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wells-&-drew.jpeg
Wells & Drew
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/midsouth-design.jpeg
MidSouth Tag & Label
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Wells & Drew company and MidSouth Tag & Label company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, MidSouth Tag & Label company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wells & Drew company.

In the current year, MidSouth Tag & Label company and Wells & Drew company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MidSouth Tag & Label company nor Wells & Drew company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MidSouth Tag & Label company nor Wells & Drew company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MidSouth Tag & Label company nor Wells & Drew company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wells & Drew company nor MidSouth Tag & Label company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wells & Drew nor MidSouth Tag & Label holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wells & Drew company nor MidSouth Tag & Label company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wells & Drew company employs more people globally than MidSouth Tag & Label company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Wells & Drew nor MidSouth Tag & Label holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wells & Drew nor MidSouth Tag & Label holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wells & Drew nor MidSouth Tag & Label holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wells & Drew nor MidSouth Tag & Label holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wells & Drew nor MidSouth Tag & Label holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wells & Drew nor MidSouth Tag & Label holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References